中欧果园草地现状:德国萨克森州和捷克共和国的多源面积估算

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Michal Forejt, R. Syrbe
{"title":"中欧果园草地现状:德国萨克森州和捷克共和国的多源面积估算","authors":"Michal Forejt, R. Syrbe","doi":"10.2478/mgr-2019-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Orchard meadows are appreciated as an integrated land use of high cultural and biological value. While such meadows are typical habitats for temperate Europe, they experienced a decline in their total area during the second half of the 20th century, both in Western and Eastern Europe. In this contribution, we compare their current area and status in terms of semantics, law, public support in general, and the efficiency of public support in both Saxony and the Czech Republic. We estimated the area in Saxony on the basis of three public mapping projects. In the Czech Republic, where no recent mapping included orchard meadows as a specific land-use type, we carried out our own mapping. Hence, we mapped 124 randomly selected plots of 1 km2. To cross-reference results from both countries, we used the pan-EU project LUCAS (Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey). According to various different sources, the orchard meadows cover 0.09–0.55% of Saxony and 0.01–0.72% of the Czech Republic. Interestingly, the results of the three mapping projects conducted in Saxony vary from each other. Although orchard meadows are supported by financial incentives of the respective governments in both countries, the Saxon approach concentrating more on individual activities (sanitation of old trees, planting, grassland management), seems more focused than the single measure practised in the Czech Republic. One key to a greater public awareness of the orchard meadow problematic can lie in the promotion of a simple expression referring to this specific landscape feature in Czech, similar to the phrase common in the German language: ‘Streuobstwiese’. Our suggestion for the Czech language is: ‘luční sad’.","PeriodicalId":45910,"journal":{"name":"Moravian Geographical Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"217 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The current status of orchard meadows in Central Europe: Multi-source area estimation in Saxony (Germany) and the Czech Republic\",\"authors\":\"Michal Forejt, R. Syrbe\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/mgr-2019-0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Orchard meadows are appreciated as an integrated land use of high cultural and biological value. While such meadows are typical habitats for temperate Europe, they experienced a decline in their total area during the second half of the 20th century, both in Western and Eastern Europe. In this contribution, we compare their current area and status in terms of semantics, law, public support in general, and the efficiency of public support in both Saxony and the Czech Republic. We estimated the area in Saxony on the basis of three public mapping projects. In the Czech Republic, where no recent mapping included orchard meadows as a specific land-use type, we carried out our own mapping. Hence, we mapped 124 randomly selected plots of 1 km2. To cross-reference results from both countries, we used the pan-EU project LUCAS (Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey). According to various different sources, the orchard meadows cover 0.09–0.55% of Saxony and 0.01–0.72% of the Czech Republic. Interestingly, the results of the three mapping projects conducted in Saxony vary from each other. Although orchard meadows are supported by financial incentives of the respective governments in both countries, the Saxon approach concentrating more on individual activities (sanitation of old trees, planting, grassland management), seems more focused than the single measure practised in the Czech Republic. One key to a greater public awareness of the orchard meadow problematic can lie in the promotion of a simple expression referring to this specific landscape feature in Czech, similar to the phrase common in the German language: ‘Streuobstwiese’. Our suggestion for the Czech language is: ‘luční sad’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Moravian Geographical Reports\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"217 - 228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Moravian Geographical Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2019-0017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moravian Geographical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2019-0017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要果园草地是一种具有较高文化和生物价值的综合土地利用方式。虽然这些草甸是温带欧洲的典型栖息地,但在20世纪下半叶,西欧和东欧的草甸总面积都出现了下降。在这篇文章中,我们从语义、法律、公众支持以及萨克森和捷克共和国公众支持的效率等方面比较了它们目前的领域和地位。我们在三个公共测绘项目的基础上估算了萨克森州的面积。在捷克共和国,由于最近的地图没有将果园草地作为特定的土地利用类型,我们进行了自己的地图绘制。因此,我们绘制了124个随机选择的1平方公里地块。为了交叉参考两国的结果,我们使用了泛欧盟项目LUCAS(土地利用/覆盖面积框架调查)。根据各种不同的资料,果园草地覆盖萨克森州的0.09-0.55%和捷克共和国的0.01-0.72%。有趣的是,在萨克森州进行的三个测绘项目的结果各不相同。尽管两国各自政府的财政激励措施都支持果园草地,但撒克逊方法更侧重于个人活动(老树的卫生、种植、草地管理),似乎比捷克共和国实行的单一措施更集中。提高公众对果园草地问题的认识的一个关键在于推广一个简单的表达,指的是捷克语中特定的景观特征,类似于德语中常见的短语:“Streuobstwiese”。我们对捷克语的建议是:' luční sad '。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The current status of orchard meadows in Central Europe: Multi-source area estimation in Saxony (Germany) and the Czech Republic
Abstract Orchard meadows are appreciated as an integrated land use of high cultural and biological value. While such meadows are typical habitats for temperate Europe, they experienced a decline in their total area during the second half of the 20th century, both in Western and Eastern Europe. In this contribution, we compare their current area and status in terms of semantics, law, public support in general, and the efficiency of public support in both Saxony and the Czech Republic. We estimated the area in Saxony on the basis of three public mapping projects. In the Czech Republic, where no recent mapping included orchard meadows as a specific land-use type, we carried out our own mapping. Hence, we mapped 124 randomly selected plots of 1 km2. To cross-reference results from both countries, we used the pan-EU project LUCAS (Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey). According to various different sources, the orchard meadows cover 0.09–0.55% of Saxony and 0.01–0.72% of the Czech Republic. Interestingly, the results of the three mapping projects conducted in Saxony vary from each other. Although orchard meadows are supported by financial incentives of the respective governments in both countries, the Saxon approach concentrating more on individual activities (sanitation of old trees, planting, grassland management), seems more focused than the single measure practised in the Czech Republic. One key to a greater public awareness of the orchard meadow problematic can lie in the promotion of a simple expression referring to this specific landscape feature in Czech, similar to the phrase common in the German language: ‘Streuobstwiese’. Our suggestion for the Czech language is: ‘luční sad’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Moravian Geographical Reports je mezinárodní časopis, publikovaný v anglickém jazyce od roku 1993 Ústavem geoniky Akademie věd ČR. Publikuje příspěvky geografů a odborníků příbuzných disciplin včetně geověd a geoekologie, které mají výraznou regionální orientaci. Základní otázku, před níž stojí v současné době tito odborníci, lze položit následovně: „Jaká je úloha regionů a lokalit v globalizované společnosti, daném geografickém měřítku a jak ji můžeme hodnotit?“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信