2010-2016年美国联邦判决中性别与家庭责任的犯罪特殊性

Q1 Social Sciences

Criminal Justice Policy Review Pub Date : 2021-06-10 DOI:10.1177/08874034211021899

Bryan Holmes, Christopher D’amato, S. Holmes

{"title":"2010-2016年美国联邦判决中性别与家庭责任的犯罪特殊性","authors":"Bryan Holmes, Christopher D’amato, S. Holmes","doi":"10.1177/08874034211021899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior sentencing research has identified leniency afforded to females (compared with males) and those with familial responsibility (compared with those without). Studies have also found that the effect of defendant gender, familial responsibility, and their intersections depend on the type of offense examined. What remains unclear is the situations in which these factors matter more or less. The purpose of this study is to disaggregate extralegal effects by understanding how gender, familial responsibility, and their intersections influence federal sentencing outcomes across various offense types. Findings from this study suggest that gender, familial responsibility, and their combinations exert different influences depending on the (a) dependent variable and (b) offense type examined.","PeriodicalId":10757,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Policy Review","volume":"33 1","pages":"399 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08874034211021899","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Offense-Specific Nature of Gender and Familial Responsibility in United States Federal Sentencing, 2010–2016\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Holmes, Christopher D’amato, S. Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08874034211021899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior sentencing research has identified leniency afforded to females (compared with males) and those with familial responsibility (compared with those without). Studies have also found that the effect of defendant gender, familial responsibility, and their intersections depend on the type of offense examined. What remains unclear is the situations in which these factors matter more or less. The purpose of this study is to disaggregate extralegal effects by understanding how gender, familial responsibility, and their intersections influence federal sentencing outcomes across various offense types. Findings from this study suggest that gender, familial responsibility, and their combinations exert different influences depending on the (a) dependent variable and (b) offense type examined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"399 - 428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08874034211021899\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211021899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211021899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的量刑研究已经确定，女性（与男性相比）和有家庭责任者（与没有家庭责任者相比）可以获得宽大处理。研究还发现，被告的性别、家庭责任及其交叉点的影响取决于所检查的犯罪类型。目前尚不清楚的是，这些因素在哪些情况下或多或少很重要。本研究的目的是通过了解性别、家庭责任及其交叉点如何影响各种犯罪类型的联邦判决结果，来分解法外效应。这项研究的结果表明，性别、家庭责任及其组合对（a）因变量和（b）犯罪类型的影响不同。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Offense-Specific Nature of Gender and Familial Responsibility in United States Federal Sentencing, 2010–2016

Prior sentencing research has identified leniency afforded to females (compared with males) and those with familial responsibility (compared with those without). Studies have also found that the effect of defendant gender, familial responsibility, and their intersections depend on the type of offense examined. What remains unclear is the situations in which these factors matter more or less. The purpose of this study is to disaggregate extralegal effects by understanding how gender, familial responsibility, and their intersections influence federal sentencing outcomes across various offense types. Findings from this study suggest that gender, familial responsibility, and their combinations exert different influences depending on the (a) dependent variable and (b) offense type examined.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Criminal Justice Policy Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Criminal Justice Policy Review (CJPR) is a multidisciplinary journal publishing articles written by scholars and professionals committed to the study of criminal justice policy through experimental and nonexperimental approaches. CJPR is published quarterly and accepts appropriate articles, essays, research notes, interviews, and book reviews. It also provides a forum for special features, which may include invited commentaries, transcripts of significant panels or meetings, position papers, and legislation. To maintain a leadership role in criminal justice policy literature, CJPR will publish articles employing diverse methodologies.