可观察的贸易数据如何很好地衡量贸易摩擦成本?来自西非国家经济共同体(ECOWAS)成员国的证据

Festus Ebo Turkson
{"title":"可观察的贸易数据如何很好地衡量贸易摩擦成本?来自西非国家经济共同体(ECOWAS)成员国的证据","authors":"Festus Ebo Turkson","doi":"10.1016/j.joat.2018.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is an empirical application of the micro-founded measure of trade costs by Head and Mayer (2004) and Novy (2013). The derived micro-founded measure, consistent with the Ricardian and heterogeneous firm's models of trade, captures all trade costs components that hitherto have been impossible to include in the gravity framework because of severe data limitations and the impracticability of measuring some of the trade cost components.</p><p>Based on bilateral trade and production data from the Trade, Production, and Protection database by Nicita and Olarreaga (2007) over the period 1980–2003, the micro-founded estimate of relative bilateral trade cost measure computed for ECOWAS clearly indicates lower trade costs among member ECOWAS countries compared with that for trade with other countries from SSA. With regard to accounting for variations in the computed measure of trade costs, the estimates obtained support the literature on the contribution of trade cost proxies to trade costs. Common non-tariff trade costs proxies explain over two-thirds of the variation in the trade costs estimates obtained for trade within the ECOWAS sub-region.</p><p>This paper argues for the need for policy makers within the sub-region to identify and reduce the trade barriers associated with trading within the ECOWAS sub-region. In addition, results from this paper, that bilateral transactions in a common currency reduces trade costs, suggest that current efforts at establishing a common currency, if successful, may improve intra-ECOWAS trade.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33808,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Trade","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 69-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joat.2018.03.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How well does observable trade data measure trade friction costs? Evidence from member countries within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)\",\"authors\":\"Festus Ebo Turkson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joat.2018.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper is an empirical application of the micro-founded measure of trade costs by Head and Mayer (2004) and Novy (2013). The derived micro-founded measure, consistent with the Ricardian and heterogeneous firm's models of trade, captures all trade costs components that hitherto have been impossible to include in the gravity framework because of severe data limitations and the impracticability of measuring some of the trade cost components.</p><p>Based on bilateral trade and production data from the Trade, Production, and Protection database by Nicita and Olarreaga (2007) over the period 1980–2003, the micro-founded estimate of relative bilateral trade cost measure computed for ECOWAS clearly indicates lower trade costs among member ECOWAS countries compared with that for trade with other countries from SSA. With regard to accounting for variations in the computed measure of trade costs, the estimates obtained support the literature on the contribution of trade cost proxies to trade costs. Common non-tariff trade costs proxies explain over two-thirds of the variation in the trade costs estimates obtained for trade within the ECOWAS sub-region.</p><p>This paper argues for the need for policy makers within the sub-region to identify and reduce the trade barriers associated with trading within the ECOWAS sub-region. In addition, results from this paper, that bilateral transactions in a common currency reduces trade costs, suggest that current efforts at establishing a common currency, if successful, may improve intra-ECOWAS trade.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Trade\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.joat.2018.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221485151830015X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221485151830015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文是对Head and Mayer(2004)和Novy(2013)的微观贸易成本测度的实证应用。衍生的微观基础度量与李嘉图和异质企业的贸易模型一致,捕获了迄今为止由于严重的数据限制和测量某些贸易成本组成部分的不切实际而无法包含在重力框架中的所有贸易成本组成部分。根据Nicita和Olarreaga(2007)的贸易、生产和保护数据库1980-2003年期间的双边贸易和生产数据,为西非经共体计算的相对双边贸易成本措施的微观基础估计清楚地表明,与与SSA其他国家的贸易相比,西非经共体成员国之间的贸易成本较低。关于计算出的贸易成本计量方法的变化,所获得的估计支持了有关贸易成本代理对贸易成本的贡献的文献。共同非关税贸易成本替代指标解释了西非经共体分区域内贸易贸易成本估计差异的三分之二以上。本文认为,分区域内的政策制定者需要确定和减少与西非经共体分区域内贸易有关的贸易壁垒。此外,本文的结果表明,使用共同货币进行双边交易可以降低贸易成本,这表明目前建立共同货币的努力如果成功,可能会改善西非经共体内部的贸易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How well does observable trade data measure trade friction costs? Evidence from member countries within the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)

This paper is an empirical application of the micro-founded measure of trade costs by Head and Mayer (2004) and Novy (2013). The derived micro-founded measure, consistent with the Ricardian and heterogeneous firm's models of trade, captures all trade costs components that hitherto have been impossible to include in the gravity framework because of severe data limitations and the impracticability of measuring some of the trade cost components.

Based on bilateral trade and production data from the Trade, Production, and Protection database by Nicita and Olarreaga (2007) over the period 1980–2003, the micro-founded estimate of relative bilateral trade cost measure computed for ECOWAS clearly indicates lower trade costs among member ECOWAS countries compared with that for trade with other countries from SSA. With regard to accounting for variations in the computed measure of trade costs, the estimates obtained support the literature on the contribution of trade cost proxies to trade costs. Common non-tariff trade costs proxies explain over two-thirds of the variation in the trade costs estimates obtained for trade within the ECOWAS sub-region.

This paper argues for the need for policy makers within the sub-region to identify and reduce the trade barriers associated with trading within the ECOWAS sub-region. In addition, results from this paper, that bilateral transactions in a common currency reduces trade costs, suggest that current efforts at establishing a common currency, if successful, may improve intra-ECOWAS trade.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
63 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信