Hocus-pocus和水力学功能：任何不值得做的事情都不值得做好

IF 3.5 2区生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

ACS Chemical Biology Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1017/iop.2023.31

Jeremy L. Schoen

{"title":"Hocus-pocus和水力学功能：任何不值得做的事情都不值得做好","authors":"Jeremy L. Schoen","doi":"10.1017/iop.2023.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was nice to see a step back from the inflated validities (e.g., Sackett, Zhang, Berry, & Lievens, 2022) promoted by many meta-analysts. Still, the use of corrected validities for purposes of selection is a dubious practice. Although the mistake of correcting for range restriction of unrestricted samples is now apparent, other problems—both technical and legal—still abound. I briefly review works (most of which are more than 40 years old) that describe these challenges. I then provide suggestions for practitioners and researchers. Ultimately, the quote from Robert Fulghum seems appropriate: “Anything not worth doing is worth not doing well.”","PeriodicalId":11,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hocus-pocus and hydraulics functions: Anything not worth doing is not worth doing well\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy L. Schoen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/iop.2023.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was nice to see a step back from the inflated validities (e.g., Sackett, Zhang, Berry, & Lievens, 2022) promoted by many meta-analysts. Still, the use of corrected validities for purposes of selection is a dubious practice. Although the mistake of correcting for range restriction of unrestricted samples is now apparent, other problems—both technical and legal—still abound. I briefly review works (most of which are more than 40 years old) that describe these challenges. I then provide suggestions for practitioners and researchers. Ultimately, the quote from Robert Fulghum seems appropriate: “Anything not worth doing is worth not doing well.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":11,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Chemical Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Chemical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.31\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2023.31","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

很高兴看到许多元分析师推崇的夸大效度(例如Sackett, Zhang, Berry， & Lievens, 2022)退后一步。然而，为了选择的目的而使用修正效度是一种可疑的做法。尽管纠正非限制样品范围限制的错误现在很明显，但其他技术和法律问题仍然比比皆是。我简要地回顾一下描述这些挑战的作品(其中大多数都是40多年前的作品)。然后，我为从业者和研究人员提供建议。最后，Robert Fulghum的一句话似乎是恰当的:“任何不值得做的事情都值得不做好。”

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Hocus-pocus and hydraulics functions: Anything not worth doing is not worth doing well

It was nice to see a step back from the inflated validities (e.g., Sackett, Zhang, Berry, & Lievens, 2022) promoted by many meta-analysts. Still, the use of corrected validities for purposes of selection is a dubious practice. Although the mistake of correcting for range restriction of unrestricted samples is now apparent, other problems—both technical and legal—still abound. I briefly review works (most of which are more than 40 years old) that describe these challenges. I then provide suggestions for practitioners and researchers. Ultimately, the quote from Robert Fulghum seems appropriate: “Anything not worth doing is worth not doing well.”

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACS Chemical Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

5.00%

发文量

353

审稿时长

3.3 months

期刊介绍： ACS Chemical Biology provides an international forum for the rapid communication of research that broadly embraces the interface between chemistry and biology. The journal also serves as a forum to facilitate the communication between biologists and chemists that will translate into new research opportunities and discoveries. Results will be published in which molecular reasoning has been used to probe questions through in vitro investigations, cell biological methods, or organismic studies. We welcome mechanistic studies on proteins, nucleic acids, sugars, lipids, and nonbiological polymers. The journal serves a large scientific community, exploring cellular function from both chemical and biological perspectives. It is understood that submitted work is based upon original results and has not been published previously.