加强对六西格玛的理解:洞察六西格玛的各个维度和方面

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Meryem Uluskan
{"title":"加强对六西格玛的理解:洞察六西格玛的各个维度和方面","authors":"Meryem Uluskan","doi":"10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Six Sigma is a powerful methodology that reduces variation, minimizes costs increase product and process quality in an organization, and ultimately maximizes customer satisfaction. This study examines the pros and cons of Six Sigma by exploring organizations’ perceptions of their implementations. In order to achieve this, survey data were gathered from 66 companies from different industries. The impact of Six Sigma on various performance dimensions is explored for different stages of Six Sigma implementation within organizations. Frequently used Six Sigma project types and the issues related to Six Sigma applications are determined from the perspective of its practitioners. Finally, for companies that do not-implement Six Sigma, reasons for not implementing this initiative are analyzed from multiple perspectives, i.e., cost of Six Sigma implementation, Six Sigma awareness, risks, the necessity of Six Sigma, the sufficiency of the company, and Six Sigma’s suitability for the company. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests are conducted to determine the differences that exist between different stages of Six Sigma experience in terms of performance scores. The main reasons for not implementing Six Sigma are verified through exploratory factor analysis, as a unique approach in the literature. The results of this study can assist managers to prepare action plans toward Six Sigma success and can encourage managers, who currently do not implement Six Sigma, to initiate the methodology within their organizations.","PeriodicalId":54353,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"99 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Six Sigma Understanding: Insights into Various Dimensions and Aspects of Six Sigma\",\"authors\":\"Meryem Uluskan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Six Sigma is a powerful methodology that reduces variation, minimizes costs increase product and process quality in an organization, and ultimately maximizes customer satisfaction. This study examines the pros and cons of Six Sigma by exploring organizations’ perceptions of their implementations. In order to achieve this, survey data were gathered from 66 companies from different industries. The impact of Six Sigma on various performance dimensions is explored for different stages of Six Sigma implementation within organizations. Frequently used Six Sigma project types and the issues related to Six Sigma applications are determined from the perspective of its practitioners. Finally, for companies that do not-implement Six Sigma, reasons for not implementing this initiative are analyzed from multiple perspectives, i.e., cost of Six Sigma implementation, Six Sigma awareness, risks, the necessity of Six Sigma, the sufficiency of the company, and Six Sigma’s suitability for the company. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests are conducted to determine the differences that exist between different stages of Six Sigma experience in terms of performance scores. The main reasons for not implementing Six Sigma are verified through exploratory factor analysis, as a unique approach in the literature. The results of this study can assist managers to prepare action plans toward Six Sigma success and can encourage managers, who currently do not implement Six Sigma, to initiate the methodology within their organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"99 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

六西格玛是一种强大的方法,可以减少变化,最大限度地降低成本,提高组织的产品和过程质量,并最终最大限度地提高客户满意度。本研究通过探索组织对六西格玛实施的看法来检验六西格玛的利弊。为了实现这一目标,调查数据收集了来自不同行业的66家公司。在组织实施六西格玛的不同阶段,探讨六西格玛对各绩效维度的影响。经常使用的六西格玛项目类型和与六西格玛应用相关的问题是从其实践者的角度确定的。最后,对于没有实施六西格玛的企业,从实施六西格玛的成本、对六西格玛的认识、风险、实施六西格玛的必要性、企业的充分性、六西格玛对企业的适用性等多个角度分析了不实施六西格玛的原因。采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验来确定六西格玛体验不同阶段在绩效得分方面存在的差异。通过探索性因子分析验证了不实施六西格玛的主要原因,这是文献中独特的方法。本研究的结果可以帮助管理人员准备六西格玛成功的行动计划,并可以鼓励目前没有实施六西格玛的管理人员在其组织内启动该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Six Sigma Understanding: Insights into Various Dimensions and Aspects of Six Sigma
Abstract Six Sigma is a powerful methodology that reduces variation, minimizes costs increase product and process quality in an organization, and ultimately maximizes customer satisfaction. This study examines the pros and cons of Six Sigma by exploring organizations’ perceptions of their implementations. In order to achieve this, survey data were gathered from 66 companies from different industries. The impact of Six Sigma on various performance dimensions is explored for different stages of Six Sigma implementation within organizations. Frequently used Six Sigma project types and the issues related to Six Sigma applications are determined from the perspective of its practitioners. Finally, for companies that do not-implement Six Sigma, reasons for not implementing this initiative are analyzed from multiple perspectives, i.e., cost of Six Sigma implementation, Six Sigma awareness, risks, the necessity of Six Sigma, the sufficiency of the company, and Six Sigma’s suitability for the company. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests are conducted to determine the differences that exist between different stages of Six Sigma experience in terms of performance scores. The main reasons for not implementing Six Sigma are verified through exploratory factor analysis, as a unique approach in the literature. The results of this study can assist managers to prepare action plans toward Six Sigma success and can encourage managers, who currently do not implement Six Sigma, to initiate the methodology within their organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Management Journal
Engineering Management Journal 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: EMJ is designed to provide practical, pertinent knowledge on the management of technology, technical professionals, and technical organizations. EMJ strives to provide value to the practice of engineering management and engineering managers. EMJ is an archival journal that facilitates both practitioners and university faculty in publishing useful articles. The primary focus is on articles that improve the practice of engineering management. To support the practice of engineering management, EMJ publishes papers within key engineering management content areas. EMJ Editors will continue to refine these areas to ensure they are aligned with the challenges faced by technical organizations and technical managers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信