{"title":"加强对六西格玛的理解:洞察六西格玛的各个维度和方面","authors":"Meryem Uluskan","doi":"10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Six Sigma is a powerful methodology that reduces variation, minimizes costs increase product and process quality in an organization, and ultimately maximizes customer satisfaction. This study examines the pros and cons of Six Sigma by exploring organizations’ perceptions of their implementations. In order to achieve this, survey data were gathered from 66 companies from different industries. The impact of Six Sigma on various performance dimensions is explored for different stages of Six Sigma implementation within organizations. Frequently used Six Sigma project types and the issues related to Six Sigma applications are determined from the perspective of its practitioners. Finally, for companies that do not-implement Six Sigma, reasons for not implementing this initiative are analyzed from multiple perspectives, i.e., cost of Six Sigma implementation, Six Sigma awareness, risks, the necessity of Six Sigma, the sufficiency of the company, and Six Sigma’s suitability for the company. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests are conducted to determine the differences that exist between different stages of Six Sigma experience in terms of performance scores. The main reasons for not implementing Six Sigma are verified through exploratory factor analysis, as a unique approach in the literature. The results of this study can assist managers to prepare action plans toward Six Sigma success and can encourage managers, who currently do not implement Six Sigma, to initiate the methodology within their organizations.","PeriodicalId":54353,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"99 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Six Sigma Understanding: Insights into Various Dimensions and Aspects of Six Sigma\",\"authors\":\"Meryem Uluskan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Six Sigma is a powerful methodology that reduces variation, minimizes costs increase product and process quality in an organization, and ultimately maximizes customer satisfaction. This study examines the pros and cons of Six Sigma by exploring organizations’ perceptions of their implementations. In order to achieve this, survey data were gathered from 66 companies from different industries. The impact of Six Sigma on various performance dimensions is explored for different stages of Six Sigma implementation within organizations. Frequently used Six Sigma project types and the issues related to Six Sigma applications are determined from the perspective of its practitioners. Finally, for companies that do not-implement Six Sigma, reasons for not implementing this initiative are analyzed from multiple perspectives, i.e., cost of Six Sigma implementation, Six Sigma awareness, risks, the necessity of Six Sigma, the sufficiency of the company, and Six Sigma’s suitability for the company. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests are conducted to determine the differences that exist between different stages of Six Sigma experience in terms of performance scores. The main reasons for not implementing Six Sigma are verified through exploratory factor analysis, as a unique approach in the literature. The results of this study can assist managers to prepare action plans toward Six Sigma success and can encourage managers, who currently do not implement Six Sigma, to initiate the methodology within their organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"99 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1852806","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing Six Sigma Understanding: Insights into Various Dimensions and Aspects of Six Sigma
Abstract Six Sigma is a powerful methodology that reduces variation, minimizes costs increase product and process quality in an organization, and ultimately maximizes customer satisfaction. This study examines the pros and cons of Six Sigma by exploring organizations’ perceptions of their implementations. In order to achieve this, survey data were gathered from 66 companies from different industries. The impact of Six Sigma on various performance dimensions is explored for different stages of Six Sigma implementation within organizations. Frequently used Six Sigma project types and the issues related to Six Sigma applications are determined from the perspective of its practitioners. Finally, for companies that do not-implement Six Sigma, reasons for not implementing this initiative are analyzed from multiple perspectives, i.e., cost of Six Sigma implementation, Six Sigma awareness, risks, the necessity of Six Sigma, the sufficiency of the company, and Six Sigma’s suitability for the company. Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests are conducted to determine the differences that exist between different stages of Six Sigma experience in terms of performance scores. The main reasons for not implementing Six Sigma are verified through exploratory factor analysis, as a unique approach in the literature. The results of this study can assist managers to prepare action plans toward Six Sigma success and can encourage managers, who currently do not implement Six Sigma, to initiate the methodology within their organizations.
期刊介绍:
EMJ is designed to provide practical, pertinent knowledge on the management of technology, technical professionals, and technical organizations. EMJ strives to provide value to the practice of engineering management and engineering managers. EMJ is an archival journal that facilitates both practitioners and university faculty in publishing useful articles. The primary focus is on articles that improve the practice of engineering management. To support the practice of engineering management, EMJ publishes papers within key engineering management content areas. EMJ Editors will continue to refine these areas to ensure they are aligned with the challenges faced by technical organizations and technical managers.