跟踪阿尔茨海默氏症患者的大脑电流——tDCS诱导的电场在患者和健康对照组之间的系统性差异

Q4 Neuroscience
Ingrid Daae Rasmussen , Matthias Mittner , Nya Mehnwolo Boayue , Gábor Csifcsák , Per M. Aslaksen
{"title":"跟踪阿尔茨海默氏症患者的大脑电流——tDCS诱导的电场在患者和健康对照组之间的系统性差异","authors":"Ingrid Daae Rasmussen ,&nbsp;Matthias Mittner ,&nbsp;Nya Mehnwolo Boayue ,&nbsp;Gábor Csifcsák ,&nbsp;Per M. Aslaksen","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2023.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Several studies on patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance neural excitability in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC). Interindividual differences in brain anatomy in AD patients pose a challenge to efficiently target the lDLPFC using scalp-based coordinates, calling for new and more precise tDCS protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to explore how AD-related neuropathology affects the tDCS-induced electric field (EF) across different DLPFC montages using computational modeling.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Forty-eight realistic head models were created from structural magnetic resonance scans of AD patients and healthy controls collected from a publicly available database. We compared the tDCS-induced EF in different montages applied in the literature, in addition to a high definition (HD)-tDCS montage centered at electrode F3.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was an overall global reduction in EF strength in the patient group, probably due to structural alterations that were also identified in the patient group. A widespread distribution of the EF was found across the frontal lobe for bipolar montages, while HD-tDCS yielded more focal stimulation, mainly restricted to the lDLPFC. Minor differences in the EF distribution were found when comparing the HD-tDCS montages.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neurodegenerative alterations present in patients with AD affect the magnitude, distribution and variability of the EF. HD-tDCS montages provide more focal stimulation of the target area, compared to bipolar montages with to pronounced group differences between AD patients and healthy matched controls. This finding poses substantial limitations to the comparison of cognitive effects of tDCS both between patients and controls and within patients at different stages of disease progression.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking the current in the Alzheimer's brain - Systematic differences between patients and healthy controls in the electric field induced by tDCS\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid Daae Rasmussen ,&nbsp;Matthias Mittner ,&nbsp;Nya Mehnwolo Boayue ,&nbsp;Gábor Csifcsák ,&nbsp;Per M. Aslaksen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ynirp.2023.100172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Several studies on patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance neural excitability in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC). Interindividual differences in brain anatomy in AD patients pose a challenge to efficiently target the lDLPFC using scalp-based coordinates, calling for new and more precise tDCS protocols.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to explore how AD-related neuropathology affects the tDCS-induced electric field (EF) across different DLPFC montages using computational modeling.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Forty-eight realistic head models were created from structural magnetic resonance scans of AD patients and healthy controls collected from a publicly available database. We compared the tDCS-induced EF in different montages applied in the literature, in addition to a high definition (HD)-tDCS montage centered at electrode F3.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was an overall global reduction in EF strength in the patient group, probably due to structural alterations that were also identified in the patient group. A widespread distribution of the EF was found across the frontal lobe for bipolar montages, while HD-tDCS yielded more focal stimulation, mainly restricted to the lDLPFC. Minor differences in the EF distribution were found when comparing the HD-tDCS montages.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neurodegenerative alterations present in patients with AD affect the magnitude, distribution and variability of the EF. HD-tDCS montages provide more focal stimulation of the target area, compared to bipolar montages with to pronounced group differences between AD patients and healthy matched controls. This finding poses substantial limitations to the comparison of cognitive effects of tDCS both between patients and controls and within patients at different stages of disease progression.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroimage. Reports\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroimage. Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266695602300017X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266695602300017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景几项针对阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的研究使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)来增强左背外侧前额叶皮层(lDLPFC)的神经兴奋性。AD患者大脑解剖结构的个体间差异对使用基于头皮的坐标有效定位lDLPFC提出了挑战,需要新的、更精确的tDCS协议。本研究的目的是通过计算模型探讨AD相关神经病理学如何影响不同DLPFC蒙太奇的tDCS诱导电场(EF)。方法从公开数据库中收集AD患者和健康对照的结构磁共振扫描,建立48个逼真的头部模型。我们比较了文献中应用的不同蒙太奇中tDCS诱导的EF,以及以电极F3为中心的高清(HD)-tDCS蒙太奇。结果患者组的EF强度总体上降低,可能是由于患者组中也发现了结构改变。在双极蒙太奇的额叶中发现EF的广泛分布,而HD tDCS产生了更多的局灶刺激,主要局限于lDLPFC。在比较HD tDCS蒙太奇时发现EF分布的微小差异。结论AD患者的神经退行性改变影响EF的大小、分布和变异性。与双相蒙太奇相比,HD tDCS蒙太奇对目标区域提供了更多的局灶性刺激,AD患者和健康对照组之间存在显著的组间差异。这一发现对tDCS在患者和对照之间以及在疾病进展的不同阶段的患者内的认知效果的比较造成了实质性的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tracking the current in the Alzheimer's brain - Systematic differences between patients and healthy controls in the electric field induced by tDCS

Background

Several studies on patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance neural excitability in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC). Interindividual differences in brain anatomy in AD patients pose a challenge to efficiently target the lDLPFC using scalp-based coordinates, calling for new and more precise tDCS protocols.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore how AD-related neuropathology affects the tDCS-induced electric field (EF) across different DLPFC montages using computational modeling.

Method

Forty-eight realistic head models were created from structural magnetic resonance scans of AD patients and healthy controls collected from a publicly available database. We compared the tDCS-induced EF in different montages applied in the literature, in addition to a high definition (HD)-tDCS montage centered at electrode F3.

Results

There was an overall global reduction in EF strength in the patient group, probably due to structural alterations that were also identified in the patient group. A widespread distribution of the EF was found across the frontal lobe for bipolar montages, while HD-tDCS yielded more focal stimulation, mainly restricted to the lDLPFC. Minor differences in the EF distribution were found when comparing the HD-tDCS montages.

Conclusion

Neurodegenerative alterations present in patients with AD affect the magnitude, distribution and variability of the EF. HD-tDCS montages provide more focal stimulation of the target area, compared to bipolar montages with to pronounced group differences between AD patients and healthy matched controls. This finding poses substantial limitations to the comparison of cognitive effects of tDCS both between patients and controls and within patients at different stages of disease progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信