新的黎明?联合王国新的纵向协议竞争法制度

Q4 Social Sciences
B. McGrath
{"title":"新的黎明?联合王国新的纵向协议竞争法制度","authors":"B. McGrath","doi":"10.4337/clj.2022.04.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 1 June 2022, competition law practitioners in the UK were placed in the unenviable position of having to assimilate two new regimes for the treatment of vertical agreements under, respectively, European Union and UK competition law. Despite the long lead-up, which in the case of the EU reforms had lasted since October 2018, practitioners had less than a month to assimilate the final text of both the new EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption Regulation and the UK’s Vertical Agreements Block Exemption Order before they entered into force. Indeed, the Competition and Markets Authority’s Guidance on the new UK regime was only available six weeks after the new Order came into effect. Despite the new UK regime being promoted as being based on ‘bespoke rules better suited to the UK’, the reality is that its final form reflects a carefully balanced review by the CMA that prioritized close alignment with the EU over divergence for its own sake. Although there are some notable differences between the two regimes, which are reviewed in this article, the overall outcome is one of dynamic alignment with an EU regime that provided the original model for modern UK competition law and looks likely to have a dominant influence on its development for the foreseeable future, despite Brexit.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new dawn? The United Kingdom’s new competition law regime for vertical agreements\",\"authors\":\"B. McGrath\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/clj.2022.04.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 1 June 2022, competition law practitioners in the UK were placed in the unenviable position of having to assimilate two new regimes for the treatment of vertical agreements under, respectively, European Union and UK competition law. Despite the long lead-up, which in the case of the EU reforms had lasted since October 2018, practitioners had less than a month to assimilate the final text of both the new EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption Regulation and the UK’s Vertical Agreements Block Exemption Order before they entered into force. Indeed, the Competition and Markets Authority’s Guidance on the new UK regime was only available six weeks after the new Order came into effect. Despite the new UK regime being promoted as being based on ‘bespoke rules better suited to the UK’, the reality is that its final form reflects a carefully balanced review by the CMA that prioritized close alignment with the EU over divergence for its own sake. Although there are some notable differences between the two regimes, which are reviewed in this article, the overall outcome is one of dynamic alignment with an EU regime that provided the original model for modern UK competition law and looks likely to have a dominant influence on its development for the foreseeable future, despite Brexit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2022.04.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2022.04.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年6月1日,英国竞争法从业者陷入了令人不快的境地,不得不分别根据欧盟和英国竞争法吸收两种新的纵向协议处理制度。尽管欧盟改革自2018年10月以来持续了很长时间,但在新的《欧盟纵向协议集体豁免条例》和英国的《纵向协议集体免除令》生效之前,从业者只有不到一个月的时间来吸收它们的最终文本。事实上,竞争与市场管理局关于英国新制度的指导意见在新命令生效六周后才发布。尽管英国新制度被宣传为基于“更适合英国的定制规则”,但现实是,其最终形式反映了CMA精心平衡的审查,该审查将与欧盟的紧密结盟置于分歧之上。尽管这两种制度之间存在一些显著的差异,本文对此进行了回顾,但总体结果是与欧盟制度保持动态一致,该制度为现代英国竞争法提供了原始模式,尽管英国脱欧,但在可预见的未来,它很可能对其发展产生主导影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new dawn? The United Kingdom’s new competition law regime for vertical agreements
On 1 June 2022, competition law practitioners in the UK were placed in the unenviable position of having to assimilate two new regimes for the treatment of vertical agreements under, respectively, European Union and UK competition law. Despite the long lead-up, which in the case of the EU reforms had lasted since October 2018, practitioners had less than a month to assimilate the final text of both the new EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption Regulation and the UK’s Vertical Agreements Block Exemption Order before they entered into force. Indeed, the Competition and Markets Authority’s Guidance on the new UK regime was only available six weeks after the new Order came into effect. Despite the new UK regime being promoted as being based on ‘bespoke rules better suited to the UK’, the reality is that its final form reflects a carefully balanced review by the CMA that prioritized close alignment with the EU over divergence for its own sake. Although there are some notable differences between the two regimes, which are reviewed in this article, the overall outcome is one of dynamic alignment with an EU regime that provided the original model for modern UK competition law and looks likely to have a dominant influence on its development for the foreseeable future, despite Brexit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Competition Law Journal
Competition Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信