衡量研究影响和对公共政策制定的影响的挑战和方法

IF 1.2 4区 法学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Sheila V. Siar
{"title":"衡量研究影响和对公共政策制定的影响的挑战和方法","authors":"Sheila V. Siar","doi":"10.1108/pap-05-2022-0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeMeasuring research’s policy influence is challenging, given the complexity of the policy process, the gradual nature of policy influence, and the time lag between research investment and impact. This paper assesses measurement approaches and discusses their merits and applications to overcome various hurdles.Design/methodology/approachRelevant articles and studies were selected and analyzed. First, the research-policy interface was revisited to understand their link and how research influences policy making. Second, the most common approaches for measuring policy influence were reviewed based on their features, strengths, and limitations.FindingsThe three approaches reviewed — pyramid, influencing, and results chain — have their respective strengths. Thus, research organizations planning to design a program for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of policy influence have to adopt the best possible features of each approach and develop a customized method depending on their objectives and overall M&E framework.Originality/valueThis paper fosters a deeper understanding of leveraging the three approaches.","PeriodicalId":34601,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenges and approaches of measuring research impact and influence on public policy making\",\"authors\":\"Sheila V. Siar\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pap-05-2022-0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeMeasuring research’s policy influence is challenging, given the complexity of the policy process, the gradual nature of policy influence, and the time lag between research investment and impact. This paper assesses measurement approaches and discusses their merits and applications to overcome various hurdles.Design/methodology/approachRelevant articles and studies were selected and analyzed. First, the research-policy interface was revisited to understand their link and how research influences policy making. Second, the most common approaches for measuring policy influence were reviewed based on their features, strengths, and limitations.FindingsThe three approaches reviewed — pyramid, influencing, and results chain — have their respective strengths. Thus, research organizations planning to design a program for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of policy influence have to adopt the best possible features of each approach and develop a customized method depending on their objectives and overall M&E framework.Originality/valueThis paper fosters a deeper understanding of leveraging the three approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-05-2022-0046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"法学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-05-2022-0046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的考虑到政策过程的复杂性、政策影响的渐进性以及研究投资与影响之间的时滞,衡量研究的政策影响具有挑战性。本文评估了测量方法,并讨论了它们的优点和应用,以克服各种障碍。设计/方法/方法选择并分析了相关文章和研究。首先,重新审视了研究-政策界面,以了解它们之间的联系以及研究如何影响政策制定。其次,根据政策影响的特点、优势和局限性,对衡量政策影响的最常见方法进行了审查。研究结果综述的三种方法——金字塔法、影响力法和结果链法——各有长处。因此,计划设计政策影响监测和评估(M&E)计划的研究组织必须采用每种方法的最佳特征,并根据其目标和总体M&E框架制定定制方法。独创性/价值本文加深了对利用这三种方法的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The challenges and approaches of measuring research impact and influence on public policy making
PurposeMeasuring research’s policy influence is challenging, given the complexity of the policy process, the gradual nature of policy influence, and the time lag between research investment and impact. This paper assesses measurement approaches and discusses their merits and applications to overcome various hurdles.Design/methodology/approachRelevant articles and studies were selected and analyzed. First, the research-policy interface was revisited to understand their link and how research influences policy making. Second, the most common approaches for measuring policy influence were reviewed based on their features, strengths, and limitations.FindingsThe three approaches reviewed — pyramid, influencing, and results chain — have their respective strengths. Thus, research organizations planning to design a program for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of policy influence have to adopt the best possible features of each approach and develop a customized method depending on their objectives and overall M&E framework.Originality/valueThis paper fosters a deeper understanding of leveraging the three approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信