红外线体温计与数字体温计在新生儿产房护理中的比较

Q4 Medicine
Sushree Smita Behura, Vetsa Snigdha Hasa, C. Jena, Santosh Kumar Panda
{"title":"红外线体温计与数字体温计在新生儿产房护理中的比较","authors":"Sushree Smita Behura, Vetsa Snigdha Hasa, C. Jena, Santosh Kumar Panda","doi":"10.1177/09732179231193874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare an infrared thermometer (IRT) at the forehead with a Digital thermometer (DT) at the axillary site in neonates in the delivery room. Temperature was assessed simultaneously in 65 neonates born at ≥34 weeks in the delivery room with IRT at the forehead site and DT at the axillary site at 1 and 5 min of age. Immediately after delayed cord clamping, skin-to-skin contact (SSC) was given for vaginal-born neonates, and a radiant warmer was used for cesarean-born neonates. In a total of 130 paired measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the IRT and the DT was good, ICC = 0.859, P < 0.001; the bias (SD) was –0.16(0.42)°C in Bland-Altman analysis. The correlation between IRT and DT during SSC was ICC = 0.881, P < .001, and the bias (SD) was –0.14(0.33)°C; and for neonates cared under radiant warmer, the ICC was 0.846, P < .001 with bias (SD) of –0.17(0.47)°C. Temperature assessed by IRT at the forehead site shows good reliability with DT at the axillary site in neonates for thermal management in the delivery room.","PeriodicalId":16516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Infrared Thermometer with Digital Thermometer in Neonates During Delivery Room Care\",\"authors\":\"Sushree Smita Behura, Vetsa Snigdha Hasa, C. Jena, Santosh Kumar Panda\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09732179231193874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To compare an infrared thermometer (IRT) at the forehead with a Digital thermometer (DT) at the axillary site in neonates in the delivery room. Temperature was assessed simultaneously in 65 neonates born at ≥34 weeks in the delivery room with IRT at the forehead site and DT at the axillary site at 1 and 5 min of age. Immediately after delayed cord clamping, skin-to-skin contact (SSC) was given for vaginal-born neonates, and a radiant warmer was used for cesarean-born neonates. In a total of 130 paired measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the IRT and the DT was good, ICC = 0.859, P < 0.001; the bias (SD) was –0.16(0.42)°C in Bland-Altman analysis. The correlation between IRT and DT during SSC was ICC = 0.881, P < .001, and the bias (SD) was –0.14(0.33)°C; and for neonates cared under radiant warmer, the ICC was 0.846, P < .001 with bias (SD) of –0.17(0.47)°C. Temperature assessed by IRT at the forehead site shows good reliability with DT at the axillary site in neonates for thermal management in the delivery room.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neonatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179231193874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179231193874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较产房新生儿前额红外温度计(IRT)和腋窝数字温度计(DT)。对65名34周以上出生在产房的新生儿同时进行体温评估,在1和5分钟时,前额部位进行IRT,腋窝部位进行DT。延迟夹紧脐带后,立即对阴道出生的新生儿进行皮肤接触(SSC),对剖宫产新生儿使用辐射加热器。在总共130次配对测量中,IRT和DT之间的组内相关系数(ICC)良好,ICC=0.859,P<0.001;Bland-Altman分析中的偏差(SD)为–0.16(0.42)°C。SSC期间IRT和DT之间的相关性为ICC=0.881,P<.001,偏差(SD)为–0.14(0.33)°C;对于在辐射加热器下护理的新生儿,ICC为0.846,P<.001,偏差(SD)为–0.17(0.47)°C。通过IRT评估的前额部位的温度显示,新生儿腋窝部位的DT在产房热管理中具有良好的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Infrared Thermometer with Digital Thermometer in Neonates During Delivery Room Care
To compare an infrared thermometer (IRT) at the forehead with a Digital thermometer (DT) at the axillary site in neonates in the delivery room. Temperature was assessed simultaneously in 65 neonates born at ≥34 weeks in the delivery room with IRT at the forehead site and DT at the axillary site at 1 and 5 min of age. Immediately after delayed cord clamping, skin-to-skin contact (SSC) was given for vaginal-born neonates, and a radiant warmer was used for cesarean-born neonates. In a total of 130 paired measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the IRT and the DT was good, ICC = 0.859, P < 0.001; the bias (SD) was –0.16(0.42)°C in Bland-Altman analysis. The correlation between IRT and DT during SSC was ICC = 0.881, P < .001, and the bias (SD) was –0.14(0.33)°C; and for neonates cared under radiant warmer, the ICC was 0.846, P < .001 with bias (SD) of –0.17(0.47)°C. Temperature assessed by IRT at the forehead site shows good reliability with DT at the axillary site in neonates for thermal management in the delivery room.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatology
Journal of Neonatology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信