“我们的植物湾”:复兴时期的政治犯和驱逐出境的判决

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
E. Bacchin
{"title":"“我们的植物湾”:复兴时期的政治犯和驱逐出境的判决","authors":"E. Bacchin","doi":"10.1086/725084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deportation was a global phenomenon of the nineteenth century that developed through proliferation and imitation; it helped to populate entire regions while, at the same time, responding to the security needs of the various countries involved. In this article, I intend to place the case of the nineteenth-century Italian states in the context of international debates on deportation, stressing the twofold originality of the Italian case: the absence of colonial territories and the focus on political convicts. During the Restoration, the states in the Italian peninsula not only implemented this practice in territories lying outside their jurisdiction, through diplomatic agreements or unidirectional procedures, but also generally transported political detainees. During decades of political and social tensions, and of frequent insurrections, the transportation of political inmates offered governments the opportunity to get rid of their political opponents. Nonetheless, during those same decades, these political dissidents became the subject of debate and international comment thanks to the reconceptualization within liberal circles of political crime and the dynamics implicit in the practice of political punishment. The cases of deportation from the territories in the Italian peninsula highlight the role played by political convicts and the transnational mobilization created around their cases in the course of the nineteenth century. Focusing on foreign political prisoners not only implied a humanitarian awareness of individual suffering but inevitably also introduced reflections on foreign policy, forms of government, and the category and role of the political convict.","PeriodicalId":46828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern History","volume":"95 1","pages":"349 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Our Botany Bay”: The Political Prisoners of the Risorgimento and the Sentence of Deportation\",\"authors\":\"E. Bacchin\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deportation was a global phenomenon of the nineteenth century that developed through proliferation and imitation; it helped to populate entire regions while, at the same time, responding to the security needs of the various countries involved. In this article, I intend to place the case of the nineteenth-century Italian states in the context of international debates on deportation, stressing the twofold originality of the Italian case: the absence of colonial territories and the focus on political convicts. During the Restoration, the states in the Italian peninsula not only implemented this practice in territories lying outside their jurisdiction, through diplomatic agreements or unidirectional procedures, but also generally transported political detainees. During decades of political and social tensions, and of frequent insurrections, the transportation of political inmates offered governments the opportunity to get rid of their political opponents. Nonetheless, during those same decades, these political dissidents became the subject of debate and international comment thanks to the reconceptualization within liberal circles of political crime and the dynamics implicit in the practice of political punishment. The cases of deportation from the territories in the Italian peninsula highlight the role played by political convicts and the transnational mobilization created around their cases in the course of the nineteenth century. Focusing on foreign political prisoners not only implied a humanitarian awareness of individual suffering but inevitably also introduced reflections on foreign policy, forms of government, and the category and role of the political convict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern History\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"349 - 384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725084\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

驱逐出境是19世纪的一种全球现象,是通过扩散和模仿发展起来的;它帮助在整个区域内居住,同时对有关各国的安全需要作出反应。在本文中,我打算将19世纪意大利国家的案例置于关于驱逐出境的国际辩论的背景下,强调意大利案例的双重独创性:没有殖民领土和关注政治犯。在复辟期间,意大利半岛各国不仅通过外交协定或单向程序在其管辖范围以外的领土上实施这种做法,而且一般也运送政治犯。在几十年的政治和社会紧张局势以及频繁的叛乱中,运送政治犯为政府提供了摆脱政治对手的机会。尽管如此,在同样的几十年里,由于政治犯罪在自由主义圈子内的重新概念化以及政治惩罚实践中隐含的动力,这些持不同政见者成为辩论和国际评论的主题。从意大利半岛领土上驱逐出境的案件突出了政治犯在19世纪所起的作用以及围绕他们的案件所产生的跨国动员。对外国政治犯的关注不仅意味着对个人苦难的人道主义意识,而且不可避免地引发了对外交政策、政府形式以及政治犯的类别和作用的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Our Botany Bay”: The Political Prisoners of the Risorgimento and the Sentence of Deportation
Deportation was a global phenomenon of the nineteenth century that developed through proliferation and imitation; it helped to populate entire regions while, at the same time, responding to the security needs of the various countries involved. In this article, I intend to place the case of the nineteenth-century Italian states in the context of international debates on deportation, stressing the twofold originality of the Italian case: the absence of colonial territories and the focus on political convicts. During the Restoration, the states in the Italian peninsula not only implemented this practice in territories lying outside their jurisdiction, through diplomatic agreements or unidirectional procedures, but also generally transported political detainees. During decades of political and social tensions, and of frequent insurrections, the transportation of political inmates offered governments the opportunity to get rid of their political opponents. Nonetheless, during those same decades, these political dissidents became the subject of debate and international comment thanks to the reconceptualization within liberal circles of political crime and the dynamics implicit in the practice of political punishment. The cases of deportation from the territories in the Italian peninsula highlight the role played by political convicts and the transnational mobilization created around their cases in the course of the nineteenth century. Focusing on foreign political prisoners not only implied a humanitarian awareness of individual suffering but inevitably also introduced reflections on foreign policy, forms of government, and the category and role of the political convict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Modern History is recognized as the leading American journal for the study of European intellectual, political, and cultural history. The Journal"s geographical and temporal scope-the history of Europe since the Renaissance-makes it unique: the JMH explores not only events and movements in specific countries, but also broader questions that span particular times and places.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信