影院在餐桌旁,影院在圆桌旁

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
B. He
{"title":"影院在餐桌旁,影院在圆桌旁","authors":"B. He","doi":"10.1080/17508061.2021.2002606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite its great physical or symbolic weight in the studies of architecture and design, the table, especially the roundtable in cinema—and its place in the history and historiographies of moving images—remains overlooked and undertheorized. This essay aims to provide an overview of why the notion of the roundtable is integral to our examination of global Chinese cinephilia throughout the special issue. To that end, the essay suggests the need to understand the table on and offscreen before we historicize the roundtable within the cinemascape. The relationship between cinema and the table as a spatial metaphor, a mode of framing, and as infrastructure is highlighted. Particularly important is how the roundtable stands out as a critical lens through which we create space for further historiographic thinking about cinema. In the essay, Roundtable Cinephilia is a working concept to acknowledge a variety of flexible cinephilic encounters across time, space, and scale, as well as across print, audiovisual, electronic, and digital platforms; it should also point to the possibility of reorientation through border-crossing experiences and encounters. In short, the essay recognizes the roundtable as a global intermedial genre, an analytical category particularly exemplified within and across the Chinese and Sinophone cinephile communities. Rather than how people gather or how they are seated around the roundtable, the most pressing question addressed in the essay, then, is whether we can have a roundtable, or common ground, not just around which to sit together, but also from where to stand up, leave, and reorient ourselves. Drawing on the special issue, we hope in this way to have taken steps toward enacting, more than just proposing, what cinema as roundtables can do.","PeriodicalId":43535,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Cinemas","volume":"15 1","pages":"176 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cinema at the table, cinema as roundtable\",\"authors\":\"B. He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17508061.2021.2002606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Despite its great physical or symbolic weight in the studies of architecture and design, the table, especially the roundtable in cinema—and its place in the history and historiographies of moving images—remains overlooked and undertheorized. This essay aims to provide an overview of why the notion of the roundtable is integral to our examination of global Chinese cinephilia throughout the special issue. To that end, the essay suggests the need to understand the table on and offscreen before we historicize the roundtable within the cinemascape. The relationship between cinema and the table as a spatial metaphor, a mode of framing, and as infrastructure is highlighted. Particularly important is how the roundtable stands out as a critical lens through which we create space for further historiographic thinking about cinema. In the essay, Roundtable Cinephilia is a working concept to acknowledge a variety of flexible cinephilic encounters across time, space, and scale, as well as across print, audiovisual, electronic, and digital platforms; it should also point to the possibility of reorientation through border-crossing experiences and encounters. In short, the essay recognizes the roundtable as a global intermedial genre, an analytical category particularly exemplified within and across the Chinese and Sinophone cinephile communities. Rather than how people gather or how they are seated around the roundtable, the most pressing question addressed in the essay, then, is whether we can have a roundtable, or common ground, not just around which to sit together, but also from where to stand up, leave, and reorient ourselves. Drawing on the special issue, we hope in this way to have taken steps toward enacting, more than just proposing, what cinema as roundtables can do.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Cinemas\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"176 - 199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Cinemas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508061.2021.2002606\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Cinemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508061.2021.2002606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管桌子,尤其是电影中的圆桌在建筑和设计研究中具有巨大的物理或象征意义,但它在历史和运动影像史学中的地位仍然被忽视和理论化不足。这篇文章旨在概述为什么圆桌会议的概念是我们在整个特刊中对全球华人电影癖的研究不可或缺的一部分。为此,这篇文章建议,在我们将电影场景中的圆桌历史化之前,有必要了解屏幕内外的圆桌。电影和桌子之间的关系作为一种空间隐喻,一种框架模式,并作为基础设施被强调。特别重要的是,圆桌会议如何脱颖而出,成为一个关键的镜头,通过它,我们为进一步的电影史学思考创造了空间。在这篇文章中,圆桌电影迷是一个工作概念,它承认各种灵活的电影迷遭遇,跨越时间、空间和规模,以及印刷、视听、电子和数字平台;它还应指出通过过境经历和遭遇重新定位的可能性。简而言之,本文认为圆桌会议是一种全球性的中间类型,这是一种分析类别,在中国和华语电影爱好者社区内部和整个社区中都得到了特别的例证。因此,这篇文章中最紧迫的问题不是人们如何聚集在一起,或者他们如何围坐在圆桌周围,而是我们是否能有一个圆桌会议,或者共同点,不仅是围绕谁坐一起,而且是从哪里站起来,离开,重新定位我们自己。借助这一特刊,我们希望通过这种方式采取措施,而不仅仅是提出圆桌会议电影可以做些什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cinema at the table, cinema as roundtable
Abstract Despite its great physical or symbolic weight in the studies of architecture and design, the table, especially the roundtable in cinema—and its place in the history and historiographies of moving images—remains overlooked and undertheorized. This essay aims to provide an overview of why the notion of the roundtable is integral to our examination of global Chinese cinephilia throughout the special issue. To that end, the essay suggests the need to understand the table on and offscreen before we historicize the roundtable within the cinemascape. The relationship between cinema and the table as a spatial metaphor, a mode of framing, and as infrastructure is highlighted. Particularly important is how the roundtable stands out as a critical lens through which we create space for further historiographic thinking about cinema. In the essay, Roundtable Cinephilia is a working concept to acknowledge a variety of flexible cinephilic encounters across time, space, and scale, as well as across print, audiovisual, electronic, and digital platforms; it should also point to the possibility of reorientation through border-crossing experiences and encounters. In short, the essay recognizes the roundtable as a global intermedial genre, an analytical category particularly exemplified within and across the Chinese and Sinophone cinephile communities. Rather than how people gather or how they are seated around the roundtable, the most pressing question addressed in the essay, then, is whether we can have a roundtable, or common ground, not just around which to sit together, but also from where to stand up, leave, and reorient ourselves. Drawing on the special issue, we hope in this way to have taken steps toward enacting, more than just proposing, what cinema as roundtables can do.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chinese Cinemas
Journal of Chinese Cinemas FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信