对秘鲁“物质历史”和奴隶制考古的反思

IF 0.5 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Colonial Latin American Review Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10609164.2022.2147311

Brendan J. M. Weaver

引用次数: 1

摘要

以材料为中心的历史倾向在任何学科中都不是最近才出现的。当然，自20世纪60年代以来，对接近过去的多种物质证据的关注一直是历史考古学的核心动力，特别是在北美(例如美国)

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reflections on ‘material histories’ and the archaeology of slavery in Peru

The tendency toward material-focused history is not a recent turn in any discipline. Cer-tainly, the concern for multiple lines of material evidence for approximating the past has been the central drive for historical archaeology since the 1960s, especially in North America (e.g

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Colonial Latin American Review HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Colonial Latin American Review (CLAR) is a unique interdisciplinary journal devoted to the study of the colonial period in Latin America. The journal was created in 1992, in response to the growing scholarly interest in colonial themes related to the Quincentenary. CLAR offers a critical forum where scholars can exchange ideas, revise traditional areas of inquiry and chart new directions of research. With the conviction that this dialogue will enrich the emerging field of Latin American colonial studies, CLAR offers a variety of scholarly approaches and formats, including articles, debates, review-essays and book reviews.