传统领袖、校长和家长对学校合并的抵制

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Naicker, Ntiyiso N. Mkhabele
{"title":"传统领袖、校长和家长对学校合并的抵制","authors":"S. Naicker, Ntiyiso N. Mkhabele","doi":"10.1080/18146627.2018.1534548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports on a study that was prompted by the resistance to school mergers by local communities in the rural region of Limpopo, South Africa. Traditional leaders, who are prominent people in rural communities, were at the forefront of protests against school mergers. Thus, it was necessary to investigate the tensions experienced by the community during the school merger process to determine the causes of the resistance. The study was conducted within a qualitative research approach using face-to-face, semi-structured interviews as the method of data collection. Six participants formed the sample comprising two traditional leaders, two principals and two parents. A significant finding was that resistance to school mergers stemmed from the cultural beliefs of the community who view schools as symbols of heritage. Another finding that emerged from the study was that a merger is precipitated by poor consultation between the Department of Education (DoE) and the community. A constraining factor in the school merger process is the provision of reliable transport for learners to travel to schools in neighbouring villages. Therefore, it is recommended that the DoE engages in discussions with stakeholders well before the merger process starts. Effective dialogue is required to discuss the community's concerns and find appropriate solutions.","PeriodicalId":44749,"journal":{"name":"Africa Education Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"122 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18146627.2018.1534548","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistance to School Mergers by Traditional Leaders, Principals and Parents\",\"authors\":\"S. Naicker, Ntiyiso N. Mkhabele\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18146627.2018.1534548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article reports on a study that was prompted by the resistance to school mergers by local communities in the rural region of Limpopo, South Africa. Traditional leaders, who are prominent people in rural communities, were at the forefront of protests against school mergers. Thus, it was necessary to investigate the tensions experienced by the community during the school merger process to determine the causes of the resistance. The study was conducted within a qualitative research approach using face-to-face, semi-structured interviews as the method of data collection. Six participants formed the sample comprising two traditional leaders, two principals and two parents. A significant finding was that resistance to school mergers stemmed from the cultural beliefs of the community who view schools as symbols of heritage. Another finding that emerged from the study was that a merger is precipitated by poor consultation between the Department of Education (DoE) and the community. A constraining factor in the school merger process is the provision of reliable transport for learners to travel to schools in neighbouring villages. Therefore, it is recommended that the DoE engages in discussions with stakeholders well before the merger process starts. Effective dialogue is required to discuss the community's concerns and find appropriate solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Education Review\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"122 - 136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/18146627.2018.1534548\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2018.1534548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2018.1534548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文报道了南非林波波省农村地区当地社区对学校合并的抵制所引发的一项研究。传统领袖是农村社区的杰出人物,他们站在反对学校合并的最前线。因此,有必要调查在学校合并过程中社区所经历的紧张局势,以确定抵抗的原因。本研究采用定性研究方法,采用面对面、半结构化访谈作为数据收集方法。六名参与者组成了样本,包括两名传统领导人、两名校长和两名家长。一个重要的发现是,对学校合并的抵制源于社区的文化信仰,他们将学校视为遗产的象征。从研究中得出的另一个发现是,合并是由于教育部(DoE)和社区之间缺乏协商而促成的。学校合并过程中的一个制约因素是为学生提供可靠的交通工具前往邻近村庄的学校。因此,建议美国能源部在合并过程开始之前就与利益相关者进行讨论。需要进行有效的对话,讨论社区关注的问题并找到适当的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resistance to School Mergers by Traditional Leaders, Principals and Parents
Abstract This article reports on a study that was prompted by the resistance to school mergers by local communities in the rural region of Limpopo, South Africa. Traditional leaders, who are prominent people in rural communities, were at the forefront of protests against school mergers. Thus, it was necessary to investigate the tensions experienced by the community during the school merger process to determine the causes of the resistance. The study was conducted within a qualitative research approach using face-to-face, semi-structured interviews as the method of data collection. Six participants formed the sample comprising two traditional leaders, two principals and two parents. A significant finding was that resistance to school mergers stemmed from the cultural beliefs of the community who view schools as symbols of heritage. Another finding that emerged from the study was that a merger is precipitated by poor consultation between the Department of Education (DoE) and the community. A constraining factor in the school merger process is the provision of reliable transport for learners to travel to schools in neighbouring villages. Therefore, it is recommended that the DoE engages in discussions with stakeholders well before the merger process starts. Effective dialogue is required to discuss the community's concerns and find appropriate solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Africa Education Review
Africa Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Africa Education Review is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that seeks the submission of unpublished articles on current educational issues. It encourages debate on theory, policy and practice on a wide range of topics that represent a variety of disciplines, interdisciplinary, cross-disciplinary and transdisciplinary interests on international and global scale. The journal therefore welcomes contributions from associated disciplines including sociology, psychology and economics. Africa Education Review is interested in stimulating scholarly and intellectual debate on education in general, and higher education in particular on a global arena. What is of particular interest to the journal are manuscripts that seek to contribute to the challenges and issues facing primary and secondary in general, and higher education on the African continent and in the global contexts in particular. The journal welcomes contributions based on sound theoretical framework relating to policy issues and practice on the various aspects of higher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信