Daniel Bensaïd在阿尔都塞扭曲的微笑之前的历史时刻

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/08935696.2023.2215143

D. Roso

{"title":"Daniel Bensaïd在阿尔都塞扭曲的微笑之前的历史时刻","authors":"D. Roso","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2023.2215143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two distinct traditions of French Marxism have deconstructed a linear representation of history: Louis Althusser and his circle formed around Reading “Capital” and Daniel Bensaïd’s own reading of Marx, inspired by Trotskyist thought. This essay examines the confrontation between Althusser’s and Bensaïd’s theories of plural temporality to demonstrate their points of agreement and disagreement, out of which a concrete theory of history becomes discernible. The essay does not simply reiterate Bensaïd’s critique of Althusser but explores the two theorists in their complexity to show that many unresolved problems of Marxism remain.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daniel Bensaïd’s Moments of History before Althusser’s Crooked Smile\",\"authors\":\"D. Roso\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2023.2215143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two distinct traditions of French Marxism have deconstructed a linear representation of history: Louis Althusser and his circle formed around Reading “Capital” and Daniel Bensaïd’s own reading of Marx, inspired by Trotskyist thought. This essay examines the confrontation between Althusser’s and Bensaïd’s theories of plural temporality to demonstrate their points of agreement and disagreement, out of which a concrete theory of history becomes discernible. The essay does not simply reiterate Bensaïd’s critique of Althusser but explores the two theorists in their complexity to show that many unresolved problems of Marxism remain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2023.2215143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2023.2215143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

法国马克思主义的两种截然不同的传统解构了历史的线性表现:路易斯·阿尔都塞和他围绕阅读《资本论》形成的圈子，以及丹尼尔Bensaïd自己在托洛茨基主义思想的启发下对马克思的阅读。本文考察了阿尔都塞和Bensaïd的多重时间性理论之间的冲突，以证明他们的一致和不同之处，从中可以看出一个具体的历史理论。这篇文章并不是简单地重申Bensaïd对阿尔都塞的批评，而是探讨了这两位理论家的复杂性，以表明马克思主义仍然存在许多未解决的问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Daniel Bensaïd’s Moments of History before Althusser’s Crooked Smile

Two distinct traditions of French Marxism have deconstructed a linear representation of history: Louis Althusser and his circle formed around Reading “Capital” and Daniel Bensaïd’s own reading of Marx, inspired by Trotskyist thought. This essay examines the confrontation between Althusser’s and Bensaïd’s theories of plural temporality to demonstrate their points of agreement and disagreement, out of which a concrete theory of history becomes discernible. The essay does not simply reiterate Bensaïd’s critique of Althusser but explores the two theorists in their complexity to show that many unresolved problems of Marxism remain.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

20.00%

发文量