使用关系作为基于概念的释义的来源

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jennifer Sikos, Sebastian Padó
{"title":"使用关系作为基于概念的释义的来源","authors":"Jennifer Sikos, Sebastian Padó","doi":"10.1075/CF.00010.SIK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Characterizing paraphrases formally has proven to be a challenging task. Hasegawa et al. (2011) pointed out the usefulness of FrameNet for\n paraphrase research, focusing on paraphrases which are backed by underlying classical linguistic relationships such as synonymy or\n voice alternations. This article proposes that other frame-to-frame-relations, notably Using, can serve as a source for\n concept-based paraphrases – that is, paraphrases that are backed by common sense knowledge, as in he called him a\n hero – he praised him for being a hero. While the predicates in these sentences are not synonymous,\n we would argue that the sentences are paraphrases – albeit of a kind that involves world knowledge about the relationship between\n different event classes. In this article, we propose a shallow taxonomy for the frame pairs which\n instantiate Using, that is motivated by their ability to form concept-based paraphrases. Second, we analyze the subclass of Using instances which supports concept-based paraphrasing, and provide a formalization of some prominent types of side\n conditions that are necessary to produce felicitous paraphrases.","PeriodicalId":42321,"journal":{"name":"Constructions and Frames","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FrameNet’s Using relation as a source of concept-based paraphrases\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Sikos, Sebastian Padó\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/CF.00010.SIK\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Characterizing paraphrases formally has proven to be a challenging task. Hasegawa et al. (2011) pointed out the usefulness of FrameNet for\\n paraphrase research, focusing on paraphrases which are backed by underlying classical linguistic relationships such as synonymy or\\n voice alternations. This article proposes that other frame-to-frame-relations, notably Using, can serve as a source for\\n concept-based paraphrases – that is, paraphrases that are backed by common sense knowledge, as in he called him a\\n hero – he praised him for being a hero. While the predicates in these sentences are not synonymous,\\n we would argue that the sentences are paraphrases – albeit of a kind that involves world knowledge about the relationship between\\n different event classes. In this article, we propose a shallow taxonomy for the frame pairs which\\n instantiate Using, that is motivated by their ability to form concept-based paraphrases. Second, we analyze the subclass of Using instances which supports concept-based paraphrasing, and provide a formalization of some prominent types of side\\n conditions that are necessary to produce felicitous paraphrases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00010.SIK\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructions and Frames","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00010.SIK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

正式描述释义已被证明是一项具有挑战性的任务。Hasegawa等人(2011)指出了FrameNet对释义研究的有用性,重点关注由潜在的经典语言关系(如同义词或语音变化)支持的释义。这篇文章提出,其他框架对框架的关系,特别是Using,可以作为基于概念的释义的来源,也就是说,由常识支持的释义,就像他称他为英雄一样,他称赞他是英雄。虽然这些句子中的谓词不是同义的,但我们认为这些句子是释义——尽管是一种涉及不同事件类之间关系的世界知识的释义。在本文中,我们为实例化Using的框架对提出了一个浅层分类,这是由它们形成基于概念的释义的能力所驱动的。其次,我们分析了支持基于概念的释义的Using instances子类,并提供了产生恰当释义所必需的一些突出类型的侧条件的形式化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FrameNet’s Using relation as a source of concept-based paraphrases
Characterizing paraphrases formally has proven to be a challenging task. Hasegawa et al. (2011) pointed out the usefulness of FrameNet for paraphrase research, focusing on paraphrases which are backed by underlying classical linguistic relationships such as synonymy or voice alternations. This article proposes that other frame-to-frame-relations, notably Using, can serve as a source for concept-based paraphrases – that is, paraphrases that are backed by common sense knowledge, as in he called him a hero – he praised him for being a hero. While the predicates in these sentences are not synonymous, we would argue that the sentences are paraphrases – albeit of a kind that involves world knowledge about the relationship between different event classes. In this article, we propose a shallow taxonomy for the frame pairs which instantiate Using, that is motivated by their ability to form concept-based paraphrases. Second, we analyze the subclass of Using instances which supports concept-based paraphrasing, and provide a formalization of some prominent types of side conditions that are necessary to produce felicitous paraphrases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Constructions and Frames
Constructions and Frames LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信