阿根廷对纳米技术的监管。纳米物体的多聚性和不稳定性

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Gonzalo L. Bailo
{"title":"阿根廷对纳米技术的监管。纳米物体的多聚性和不稳定性","authors":"Gonzalo L. Bailo","doi":"10.22187/rfd2018n45a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is framed in the area of Science and Technology Studies (STS) that studies the relationships between law, democracy and nanotechnologies. It is analyzed nanotechnologies regulatory experience in Argentina between 2001-2017 by tracing and processing national bills, institutional initiatives and expert discourses committed on the coproduction of a “nano” scientific-legal knowledge. It is identified two major phases. The first phase (2001-2006) leads to the creation by decree of the Argentinian Nanotechnology Foundation (FAN) and includes several critics about it. The second phase (2007-present) begins with the creation of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation Ministry (MINCyT) and adopts a “nano” governance model that combines expert institutionalism with the implementation of global standardization regulation. It is concluded that the instability and polysemic character of nano-objects repositions various types of knowledge as mediators of regulatory and institutional models. This paper aims to contribute: a) in general, to current discussions about the legal modes of stabilizing controversial objects; b) in particular, to describe how legal actors visualize nano-objects in Argentina.","PeriodicalId":53805,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La regulación de las nanotecnologías en Argentina. Sobre polisemia e inestabilidad de los nano-objetos\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo L. Bailo\",\"doi\":\"10.22187/rfd2018n45a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is framed in the area of Science and Technology Studies (STS) that studies the relationships between law, democracy and nanotechnologies. It is analyzed nanotechnologies regulatory experience in Argentina between 2001-2017 by tracing and processing national bills, institutional initiatives and expert discourses committed on the coproduction of a “nano” scientific-legal knowledge. It is identified two major phases. The first phase (2001-2006) leads to the creation by decree of the Argentinian Nanotechnology Foundation (FAN) and includes several critics about it. The second phase (2007-present) begins with the creation of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation Ministry (MINCyT) and adopts a “nano” governance model that combines expert institutionalism with the implementation of global standardization regulation. It is concluded that the instability and polysemic character of nano-objects repositions various types of knowledge as mediators of regulatory and institutional models. This paper aims to contribute: a) in general, to current discussions about the legal modes of stabilizing controversial objects; b) in particular, to describe how legal actors visualize nano-objects in Argentina.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22187/rfd2018n45a1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22187/rfd2018n45a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的框架是在科学技术研究(STS)领域,该领域研究法律、民主和纳米技术之间的关系。通过追踪和处理致力于“纳米”科学-法律知识联合生产的国家法案、机构倡议和专家话语,分析了阿根廷2001-2017年纳米技术监管经验。它被确定为两个主要阶段。第一阶段(2001-2006年)导致了阿根廷纳米技术基金会(FAN)的成立,其中包括一些对它的批评。第二阶段(2007年至今)以建立科学、技术和生产创新部(MINCyT)开始,并采用一种“纳米”治理模式,将专家制度主义与全球标准化监管的实施相结合。结论是,纳米对象的不稳定性和多义性将各种类型的知识重新定位为监管和制度模型的中介。本文的目的是:a)总的来说,当前关于稳定争议对象的法律模式的讨论;b)特别是,描述法律行为者如何在阿根廷设想纳米物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La regulación de las nanotecnologías en Argentina. Sobre polisemia e inestabilidad de los nano-objetos
This paper is framed in the area of Science and Technology Studies (STS) that studies the relationships between law, democracy and nanotechnologies. It is analyzed nanotechnologies regulatory experience in Argentina between 2001-2017 by tracing and processing national bills, institutional initiatives and expert discourses committed on the coproduction of a “nano” scientific-legal knowledge. It is identified two major phases. The first phase (2001-2006) leads to the creation by decree of the Argentinian Nanotechnology Foundation (FAN) and includes several critics about it. The second phase (2007-present) begins with the creation of Science, Technology and Productive Innovation Ministry (MINCyT) and adopts a “nano” governance model that combines expert institutionalism with the implementation of global standardization regulation. It is concluded that the instability and polysemic character of nano-objects repositions various types of knowledge as mediators of regulatory and institutional models. This paper aims to contribute: a) in general, to current discussions about the legal modes of stabilizing controversial objects; b) in particular, to describe how legal actors visualize nano-objects in Argentina.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信