EXPRESS:“可能是什么”:玛丽·帕克·福莱特对悖论理论的启示

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
R. Bednarek, Wendy K. Smith
{"title":"EXPRESS:“可能是什么”:玛丽·帕克·福莱特对悖论理论的启示","authors":"R. Bednarek, Wendy K. Smith","doi":"10.1177/14761270231151734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars increasingly turn to paradox theory to offer insight into our world’s greatest challenges. Yet to contribute to radical strategy theorizing concerning those challenges and avoid premature convergence on a narrow set of ideas, paradox scholars need new insights. We turn to early 20th century scholar and activist Mary Parker Follett. We highlight the alignment between Follett’s philosophy and contemporary paradox theory, showing that the two approaches are well-suited traveling companions. Drawing on these similarities, we then explore how Follett’s novel insights emphasize ‘what is’ rather than ‘what may be’ and in doing so challenge and expand on paradox theory. Specifically, these ideas help paradox theory reimagining of organizations and strategizing by focusing on 1) how the micro constructs the macro; 2) possibilities for meaningful change; and 3) participatory interactions. By doing so, we argue that Follet pushes paradox scholars to contribute to more radical strategy theorizing.","PeriodicalId":22087,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Organization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: ‘What may be’: Inspiration from Mary Parker Follett for Paradox Theory\",\"authors\":\"R. Bednarek, Wendy K. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14761270231151734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholars increasingly turn to paradox theory to offer insight into our world’s greatest challenges. Yet to contribute to radical strategy theorizing concerning those challenges and avoid premature convergence on a narrow set of ideas, paradox scholars need new insights. We turn to early 20th century scholar and activist Mary Parker Follett. We highlight the alignment between Follett’s philosophy and contemporary paradox theory, showing that the two approaches are well-suited traveling companions. Drawing on these similarities, we then explore how Follett’s novel insights emphasize ‘what is’ rather than ‘what may be’ and in doing so challenge and expand on paradox theory. Specifically, these ideas help paradox theory reimagining of organizations and strategizing by focusing on 1) how the micro constructs the macro; 2) possibilities for meaningful change; and 3) participatory interactions. By doing so, we argue that Follet pushes paradox scholars to contribute to more radical strategy theorizing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Organization\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270231151734\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270231151734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学者们越来越多地转向悖论理论,为我们这个世界面临的最大挑战提供见解。然而,为了对这些挑战的激进策略理论化做出贡献,并避免过早地趋同于一组狭隘的观点,悖论学者需要新的见解。我们转向20世纪早期的学者和活动家玛丽·帕克·福莱特。我们强调福莱特的哲学与当代悖论理论之间的一致性,表明这两种方法是非常适合的旅伴。利用这些相似之处,我们接着探讨了福莱特的新见解是如何强调“是什么”而不是“可能是什么”的,并在这样做的过程中挑战和扩展了悖论理论。具体来说,这些观点通过关注1)微观如何构建宏观来帮助悖论理论重新构想组织和制定战略;2)有意义变革的可能性;3)参与式互动。通过这样做,我们认为Follet推动悖论学者为更激进的策略理论化做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: ‘What may be’: Inspiration from Mary Parker Follett for Paradox Theory
Scholars increasingly turn to paradox theory to offer insight into our world’s greatest challenges. Yet to contribute to radical strategy theorizing concerning those challenges and avoid premature convergence on a narrow set of ideas, paradox scholars need new insights. We turn to early 20th century scholar and activist Mary Parker Follett. We highlight the alignment between Follett’s philosophy and contemporary paradox theory, showing that the two approaches are well-suited traveling companions. Drawing on these similarities, we then explore how Follett’s novel insights emphasize ‘what is’ rather than ‘what may be’ and in doing so challenge and expand on paradox theory. Specifically, these ideas help paradox theory reimagining of organizations and strategizing by focusing on 1) how the micro constructs the macro; 2) possibilities for meaningful change; and 3) participatory interactions. By doing so, we argue that Follet pushes paradox scholars to contribute to more radical strategy theorizing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
8.20%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Strategic Organization is devoted to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed, discipline-grounded conceptual and empirical research of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners of strategic management and organization. The journal also aims to be of considerable interest to senior managers in government, industry, and particularly the growing management consulting industry. Strategic Organization provides an international, interdisciplinary forum designed to improve our understanding of the interrelated dynamics of strategic and organizational processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信