对批评家的回应：现象主义、谬误主义和有限性

IF 0.7 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/09672559.2022.2162316

Luz Christopher Seiberth

{"title":"对批评家的回应：现象主义、谬误主义和有限性","authors":"Luz Christopher Seiberth","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2022.2162316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT I respond to objections from three rigorous readers challenging me to detail in what sense Sellars is a transcendental philosopher, as well as to defend the claim that ‘picturing’ is crucial to his account of intentionality. This further involves defending the tenability of transcendental phenomenalism and arguing against scepticism about picturing. Finally, this involves the question of whether the results of transcendental analyses undermine the legitimacy of the Manifest Image, and, consequently, to say what knowledge about phenomena can mean in the succession of conceptual frameworks.","PeriodicalId":51828,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","volume":"30 1","pages":"559 - 572"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Critics: Phenomenalism, Fallibilism and Finitude\",\"authors\":\"Luz Christopher Seiberth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09672559.2022.2162316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT I respond to objections from three rigorous readers challenging me to detail in what sense Sellars is a transcendental philosopher, as well as to defend the claim that ‘picturing’ is crucial to his account of intentionality. This further involves defending the tenability of transcendental phenomenalism and arguing against scepticism about picturing. Finally, this involves the question of whether the results of transcendental analyses undermine the legitimacy of the Manifest Image, and, consequently, to say what knowledge about phenomena can mean in the succession of conceptual frameworks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"559 - 572\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2022.2162316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2022.2162316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要我回应了三位严谨的读者的反对意见，他们要求我详细说明塞拉斯是一位什么意义上的超验哲学家，并为“描绘”对他对意向性的描述至关重要的说法辩护。这进一步涉及到捍卫先验现象主义的成立性，并反对对绘画的怀疑。最后，这涉及到一个问题，即先验分析的结果是否破坏了显象的合法性，从而说明关于现象的知识在概念框架的继承中意味着什么。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Response to Critics: Phenomenalism, Fallibilism and Finitude

ABSTRACT I respond to objections from three rigorous readers challenging me to detail in what sense Sellars is a transcendental philosopher, as well as to defend the claim that ‘picturing’ is crucial to his account of intentionality. This further involves defending the tenability of transcendental phenomenalism and arguing against scepticism about picturing. Finally, this involves the question of whether the results of transcendental analyses undermine the legitimacy of the Manifest Image, and, consequently, to say what knowledge about phenomena can mean in the succession of conceptual frameworks.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Philosophical Studies (IJPS) publishes academic articles of the highest quality from both analytic and continental traditions and provides a forum for publishing on a broader range of issues than is currently available in philosophical journals. IJPS also publishes annual special issues devoted to key thematic areas or to critical engagements with contemporary philosophers of note. Through its Discussion section, it provides a lively forum for exchange of ideas and encourages dialogue and mutual comprehension across all philosophical traditions. The journal also contains an extensive book review section, including occasional book symposia. It also provides Critical Notices which review major books or themes in depth.