PedCheck:一个分析掠夺性期刊的社交媒体帖子的仪表板

IF 0.6 4区管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Serials Review Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00987913.2022.2046459

M. Dadkhah, F. Rahimnia, M. Oermann

{"title":"PedCheck:一个分析掠夺性期刊的社交媒体帖子的仪表板","authors":"M. Dadkhah, F. Rahimnia, M. Oermann","doi":"10.1080/00987913.2022.2046459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Predatory journals are continuing to expand across disciplines and target researchers via different media such as websites and spam emails to potential authors. While multiple studies have described characteristics of predatory journals, less research has been on done on authors’ perceptions of and experiences with predatory journals. In this paper, by using a data science approach, we developed a tool that analyzes the content of social media and summarizes what users (authors) have shared about predatory journals. This tool is useful in understanding the current concerns of researchers about predatory journals and examining current activities of these journals.","PeriodicalId":54165,"journal":{"name":"Serials Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"224 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PedCheck: A Dashboard for Analyzing Social Media Posts about Predatory Journals\",\"authors\":\"M. Dadkhah, F. Rahimnia, M. Oermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00987913.2022.2046459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Predatory journals are continuing to expand across disciplines and target researchers via different media such as websites and spam emails to potential authors. While multiple studies have described characteristics of predatory journals, less research has been on done on authors’ perceptions of and experiences with predatory journals. In this paper, by using a data science approach, we developed a tool that analyzes the content of social media and summarizes what users (authors) have shared about predatory journals. This tool is useful in understanding the current concerns of researchers about predatory journals and examining current activities of these journals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serials Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"224 - 230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serials Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2022.2046459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serials Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2022.2046459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要掠夺性期刊正在继续跨学科扩展，并通过不同的媒体（如网站和向潜在作者发送垃圾邮件）瞄准研究人员。虽然多项研究描述了掠夺性期刊的特征，但对作者对掠夺性期刊看法和经历的研究较少。在这篇论文中，通过使用数据科学方法，我们开发了一种工具，分析社交媒体的内容，并总结用户（作者）对掠夺性期刊的分享。该工具有助于了解研究人员目前对掠夺性期刊的担忧，并检查这些期刊的当前活动。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

PedCheck: A Dashboard for Analyzing Social Media Posts about Predatory Journals

Abstract Predatory journals are continuing to expand across disciplines and target researchers via different media such as websites and spam emails to potential authors. While multiple studies have described characteristics of predatory journals, less research has been on done on authors’ perceptions of and experiences with predatory journals. In this paper, by using a data science approach, we developed a tool that analyzes the content of social media and summarizes what users (authors) have shared about predatory journals. This tool is useful in understanding the current concerns of researchers about predatory journals and examining current activities of these journals.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Serials Review INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Serials Review, issued quarterly, is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal for the international serials community. Articles focus on serials in the broadest sense of the term and cover all aspects of serials information; regular columns feature interviews, exchanges on controversial topics, book reviews, and conference reports. The journal encompasses practical, theoretical, and visionary ideas for librarians, publishers, vendors, and anyone interested in the changing nature of serials. Serials Review covers all aspects of serials management: format considerations, publishing models, statistical studies, collection analysis, collaborative efforts, reference and access issues, cataloging and acquisitions, people who have shaped the serials community, and topical bibliographic studies.