{"title":"民事论文中的比较法","authors":"O. Kuznetsova","doi":"10.33397/2619-0559-2020-2-2-183-214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"dialectical and formal logics were used, especially methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison, as well as the juridical dogmatic method of cognition. Results: on the basis of approaches, principles and rules developed by the doctrine of comparison, a “roadmap” was defined for using the comparative legal method in thesis works: formulation of purpose of addressing the foreign experience of legal regulation; choosing the legal system for comparison; understanding the contents of the foreign law norms; discovering similarities and differences in legal regulation; comments, critical examination and execution of the results obtained from comparison.","PeriodicalId":33643,"journal":{"name":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE LEGAL METHOD IN CIVIL THESES\",\"authors\":\"O. Kuznetsova\",\"doi\":\"10.33397/2619-0559-2020-2-2-183-214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"dialectical and formal logics were used, especially methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison, as well as the juridical dogmatic method of cognition. Results: on the basis of approaches, principles and rules developed by the doctrine of comparison, a “roadmap” was defined for using the comparative legal method in thesis works: formulation of purpose of addressing the foreign experience of legal regulation; choosing the legal system for comparison; understanding the contents of the foreign law norms; discovering similarities and differences in legal regulation; comments, critical examination and execution of the results obtained from comparison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33397/2619-0559-2020-2-2-183-214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33397/2619-0559-2020-2-2-183-214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
dialectical and formal logics were used, especially methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison, as well as the juridical dogmatic method of cognition. Results: on the basis of approaches, principles and rules developed by the doctrine of comparison, a “roadmap” was defined for using the comparative legal method in thesis works: formulation of purpose of addressing the foreign experience of legal regulation; choosing the legal system for comparison; understanding the contents of the foreign law norms; discovering similarities and differences in legal regulation; comments, critical examination and execution of the results obtained from comparison.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
