比较引理

IF 0.6 2区数学 Q2 LOGIC

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic Pub Date : 2023-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.apal.2023.103329

John R. Steel

{"title":"比较引理","authors":"John R. Steel","doi":"10.1016/j.apal.2023.103329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The standard comparison lemma of inner model theory is deficient, in that it does not in general produce a comparison of all the relevant inputs. How two mice compare can depend upon which iteration strategies are used to compare them. We shall outline here a method for comparing iteration strategies that removes this defect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50762,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic","volume":"175 1","pages":"Article 103329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comparison lemma\",\"authors\":\"John R. Steel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apal.2023.103329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The standard comparison lemma of inner model theory is deficient, in that it does not in general produce a comparison of all the relevant inputs. How two mice compare can depend upon which iteration strategies are used to compare them. We shall outline here a method for comparing iteration strategies that removes this defect.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic\",\"volume\":\"175 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 103329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007223000866\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007223000866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

内模理论的标准比较引理是有缺陷的，因为它通常不能对所有相关输入进行比较。两个鼠标如何比较取决于使用哪种迭代策略来比较它们。我们将在这里概述一种方法，用于比较消除此缺陷的迭代策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The comparison lemma

The standard comparison lemma of inner model theory is deficient, in that it does not in general produce a comparison of all the relevant inputs. How two mice compare can depend upon which iteration strategies are used to compare them. We shall outline here a method for comparing iteration strategies that removes this defect.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 数学-数学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

200 days

期刊介绍： The journal Annals of Pure and Applied Logic publishes high quality papers in all areas of mathematical logic as well as applications of logic in mathematics, in theoretical computer science and in other related disciplines. All submissions to the journal should be mathematically correct, well written (preferably in English)and contain relevant new results that are of significant interest to a substantial number of logicians. The journal also considers submissions that are somewhat too long to be published by other journals while being too short to form a separate memoir provided that they are of particular outstanding quality and broad interest. In addition, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic occasionally publishes special issues of selected papers from well-chosen conferences in pure and applied logic.