失败严重程度对满意度和行为的影响:基于正义理论和监管焦点理论的视角

IF 2.7 Q2 BUSINESS
Sarabjit Kaur Sidhu, F. S. Ong, M. Balaji
{"title":"失败严重程度对满意度和行为的影响:基于正义理论和监管焦点理论的视角","authors":"Sarabjit Kaur Sidhu, F. S. Ong, M. Balaji","doi":"10.1108/jcm-06-2022-5412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the moderating role of low and high failure severity levels on recovery satisfaction and on behavioral intentions through recovery satisfaction. This research adopted justice theory and regulatory focus theory to provide further explanations on the inconsistencies in the extant literature regarding service failure and responses to service recovery.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study applied a scenario-based experimental design of two (perceived justice: low vs high) by two (failure severity: low vs high) between-subjects factorial design. Data was collected from 237 mobile phone users recruited via convenience sampling. This study examined the hypothesized relations using Hayes (2018) PROCESS macro version 4.0.\n\n\nFindings\nPerceived justice had a higher positive effect on recovery satisfaction at a high failure severity level. The direct effect of perceived justice on behavioral intentions was significant and positive only at a high level of failure severity, whereas the indirect effect of perceived justice on consumers’ positive behavior through recovery satisfaction was more positive at a high level of failure severity.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nJustice theory and regulatory focus theory can be used to explain how a well-implemented recovery effort can offset losses that are caused by a highly severe service failure leading to satisfaction and positive responses. However, as this study was conducted within a telecommunication service context, this research needs to be replicated in other areas, including the use of other data collection methods and measurement of consumers’ regulatory focus orientation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of this study provide managers with valuable insights into the allocation of service providers’ resources for recovery actions according to consumers’ perceived severity levels to regain consumer satisfaction and continued positive behavioral intentions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPast research on the effect of failure severity levels on recovery satisfaction and consumers’ positive behavioral intentions is scant, and those studies that examined severity levels have shown conflicting results. This study attempted to advance the research by examining the relationship between perceived justice, recovery satisfaction and behavioral intentions at low and high failure severity levels using justice theory and regulatory focus theory. None of the theories have been examined concurrently in the service failure and recovery framework.\n","PeriodicalId":35923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of failure severity levels on satisfaction and behavior: from the perspectives of justice theory and regulatory focus theory\",\"authors\":\"Sarabjit Kaur Sidhu, F. S. Ong, M. Balaji\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcm-06-2022-5412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to investigate the moderating role of low and high failure severity levels on recovery satisfaction and on behavioral intentions through recovery satisfaction. This research adopted justice theory and regulatory focus theory to provide further explanations on the inconsistencies in the extant literature regarding service failure and responses to service recovery.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study applied a scenario-based experimental design of two (perceived justice: low vs high) by two (failure severity: low vs high) between-subjects factorial design. Data was collected from 237 mobile phone users recruited via convenience sampling. This study examined the hypothesized relations using Hayes (2018) PROCESS macro version 4.0.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nPerceived justice had a higher positive effect on recovery satisfaction at a high failure severity level. The direct effect of perceived justice on behavioral intentions was significant and positive only at a high level of failure severity, whereas the indirect effect of perceived justice on consumers’ positive behavior through recovery satisfaction was more positive at a high level of failure severity.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nJustice theory and regulatory focus theory can be used to explain how a well-implemented recovery effort can offset losses that are caused by a highly severe service failure leading to satisfaction and positive responses. However, as this study was conducted within a telecommunication service context, this research needs to be replicated in other areas, including the use of other data collection methods and measurement of consumers’ regulatory focus orientation.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings of this study provide managers with valuable insights into the allocation of service providers’ resources for recovery actions according to consumers’ perceived severity levels to regain consumer satisfaction and continued positive behavioral intentions.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nPast research on the effect of failure severity levels on recovery satisfaction and consumers’ positive behavioral intentions is scant, and those studies that examined severity levels have shown conflicting results. This study attempted to advance the research by examining the relationship between perceived justice, recovery satisfaction and behavioral intentions at low and high failure severity levels using justice theory and regulatory focus theory. None of the theories have been examined concurrently in the service failure and recovery framework.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":35923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-06-2022-5412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-06-2022-5412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨低、高故障严重程度通过恢复满意度对恢复满意度和行为意向的调节作用。本研究采用公正理论和监管焦点理论,进一步解释了现有文献关于服务失效和服务恢复反应的不一致性。设计/方法/方法本研究采用基于场景的实验设计,两组(感知公正:低vs高),两组(失败严重程度:低vs高)受试者间析因设计。数据通过方便抽样的方式从237名手机用户中收集。本研究使用Hayes (2018) PROCESS宏观4.0版本检验了假设的关系。结果发现,在失败严重程度高的情况下,公平感对康复满意度有较高的正向影响。感知公平对消费者行为意向的直接影响在失败严重程度高的情况下才显著且正向,而感知公平通过恢复满意对消费者积极行为的间接影响在失败严重程度高的情况下更为正向。研究的局限性/启示正义理论和监管焦点理论可以用来解释一个实施良好的恢复工作如何抵消由高度严重的服务故障造成的损失,从而导致满意度和积极的反应。然而,由于这项研究是在电信服务背景下进行的,这项研究需要在其他领域进行复制,包括使用其他数据收集方法和测量消费者的监管焦点方向。实践启示本研究的发现为管理者提供了宝贵的见解,以了解服务提供者如何根据消费者感知到的严重程度来分配恢复行动的资源,以重新获得消费者满意度和持续的积极行为意图。独创性/价值过去关于失败严重程度对恢复满意度和消费者积极行为意图的影响的研究很少,那些检查严重程度的研究显示出相互矛盾的结果。本研究试图运用公正理论和监管焦点理论,探讨低、高失败严重程度下感知公正、康复满意度和行为意向之间的关系。在服务故障和恢复框架中,没有一个理论被同时检验过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of failure severity levels on satisfaction and behavior: from the perspectives of justice theory and regulatory focus theory
Purpose This study aims to investigate the moderating role of low and high failure severity levels on recovery satisfaction and on behavioral intentions through recovery satisfaction. This research adopted justice theory and regulatory focus theory to provide further explanations on the inconsistencies in the extant literature regarding service failure and responses to service recovery. Design/methodology/approach This study applied a scenario-based experimental design of two (perceived justice: low vs high) by two (failure severity: low vs high) between-subjects factorial design. Data was collected from 237 mobile phone users recruited via convenience sampling. This study examined the hypothesized relations using Hayes (2018) PROCESS macro version 4.0. Findings Perceived justice had a higher positive effect on recovery satisfaction at a high failure severity level. The direct effect of perceived justice on behavioral intentions was significant and positive only at a high level of failure severity, whereas the indirect effect of perceived justice on consumers’ positive behavior through recovery satisfaction was more positive at a high level of failure severity. Research limitations/implications Justice theory and regulatory focus theory can be used to explain how a well-implemented recovery effort can offset losses that are caused by a highly severe service failure leading to satisfaction and positive responses. However, as this study was conducted within a telecommunication service context, this research needs to be replicated in other areas, including the use of other data collection methods and measurement of consumers’ regulatory focus orientation. Practical implications The findings of this study provide managers with valuable insights into the allocation of service providers’ resources for recovery actions according to consumers’ perceived severity levels to regain consumer satisfaction and continued positive behavioral intentions. Originality/value Past research on the effect of failure severity levels on recovery satisfaction and consumers’ positive behavioral intentions is scant, and those studies that examined severity levels have shown conflicting results. This study attempted to advance the research by examining the relationship between perceived justice, recovery satisfaction and behavioral intentions at low and high failure severity levels using justice theory and regulatory focus theory. None of the theories have been examined concurrently in the service failure and recovery framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Journal of Consumer Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: ■Consumer behaviour ■Customer policy and service ■Practical case studies to illustrate concepts ■The latest thinking and research in marketing planning ■The marketing of services worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信