攻击性、仇恨性言论:新冠疫情期间中国微博的网络话语指责与正义诉求实践

IF 1.4 2区文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION

Discourse Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1177/14614456221129485

Ying Jin, Dennis Tay

{"title":"攻击性、仇恨性言论:新冠疫情期间中国微博的网络话语指责与正义诉求实践","authors":"Ying Jin, Dennis Tay","doi":"10.1177/14614456221129485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using data from user comments to the official social networking account of the Hubei Red Cross Foundation on a participatory web platform, this study attends to the offensive and hateful comments produced by ordinary Internet users to blame the elite authorities for their malfeasance in managing the donation during the COVID-19 in China. Drawing on Discursive Psychology, we focus on the rhetorical strategies that users employ to legitimise their actions as well-founded evidential blame against a norm-breaking act rather than radical extremist speech. The associated hatred among discussants are moral, social judgements. That said, hate speech also helps construct the moral standards of a normalised society.","PeriodicalId":47598,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"3-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Offensive, hateful comment: A networked discourse practice of blame and petition for justice during COVID-19 on Chinese Weibo.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Jin, Dennis Tay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14614456221129485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using data from user comments to the official social networking account of the Hubei Red Cross Foundation on a participatory web platform, this study attends to the offensive and hateful comments produced by ordinary Internet users to blame the elite authorities for their malfeasance in managing the donation during the COVID-19 in China. Drawing on Discursive Psychology, we focus on the rhetorical strategies that users employ to legitimise their actions as well-founded evidential blame against a norm-breaking act rather than radical extremist speech. The associated hatred among discussants are moral, social judgements. That said, hate speech also helps construct the moral standards of a normalised society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"3-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221129485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221129485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用用户在参与式网络平台上对湖北省红十字会官方社交账号的评论数据，关注普通互联网用户在中国新冠肺炎疫情期间指责精英当局管理捐赠不当的攻击性和仇恨性评论。利用话语心理学，我们关注用户使用的修辞策略，将他们的行为合法化，作为对违反规范行为的有充分根据的证据，而不是激进的极端主义言论。讨论者之间的相关仇恨是道德和社会判断。话虽如此，仇恨言论也有助于构建一个正常化社会的道德标准。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Offensive, hateful comment: A networked discourse practice of blame and petition for justice during COVID-19 on Chinese Weibo.

Using data from user comments to the official social networking account of the Hubei Red Cross Foundation on a participatory web platform, this study attends to the offensive and hateful comments produced by ordinary Internet users to blame the elite authorities for their malfeasance in managing the donation during the COVID-19 in China. Drawing on Discursive Psychology, we focus on the rhetorical strategies that users employ to legitimise their actions as well-founded evidential blame against a norm-breaking act rather than radical extremist speech. The associated hatred among discussants are moral, social judgements. That said, hate speech also helps construct the moral standards of a normalised society.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Discourse Studies COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Discourse Studies is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal for the study of text and talk. Publishing outstanding work on the structures and strategies of written and spoken discourse, special attention is given to cross-disciplinary studies of text and talk in linguistics, anthropology, ethnomethodology, cognitive and social psychology, communication studies and law.