识别定义截肢患者功能的假肢能力

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Elizabeth M. Bell, Jessica Carrignan, Douglas Kurt Collier, Ji Seung Yang, J. Shim
{"title":"识别定义截肢患者功能的假肢能力","authors":"Elizabeth M. Bell, Jessica Carrignan, Douglas Kurt Collier, Ji Seung Yang, J. Shim","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Although the physical abilities associated with activity, exercise, and fitness within the general population of individuals without disabilities have been well established, it is unclear if these abilities define the physical function of individuals with lower-limb amputations (LLAs) who use a prosthesis. A multidimensional definition of the physical function of people with LLA must consider what abilities are necessary and relevant. Objectives This literature review aimed to identify common abilities used to evaluate the physical function of people with LLA. A secondary aim was to evaluate if each identified ability had been indirectly addressed by existing questionnaires and performance-based tests. Study Design Literature Review. Methods Ten common physical abilities associated with measuring the physical function of LLA were identified through literature review. These identified abilities were used to assess what aspects had been indirectly addressed by existing questionnaires and performance-based evaluations of LLA physical function. Results and Conclusions Abilities identified through literature review included agility, balance, comfort, endurance, flexibility, load, maneuverability, power, strength, and symmetry. These 10 abilities are important and commonly used as outcome measures associated with the physical function of people with LLA. Although each ability was addressed by multiple assessments, no assessment addressed all 10 identified abilities. The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee, Rivermead Mobility Index, and the Amputee Mobility Predictor addressed most (8–9 of 10) of the identified abilities. There were clear differences and gaps in the abilities addressed by current assessments, possibly because they rely on an incomplete definition of what is required for LLA physical function. We propose that these 10 abilities are unique and underlie the definition of LLA physical function. However, future work must assess the validity of this proposed framework. Clinical Relevance A multidimensional definition of LLA physical function is necessary to enable more appropriate prosthetic design, prescription, and use. Promoting greater mobility and physical activity levels within this population will improve health of people with LLA.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"34 1","pages":"e9 - e19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Prosthetic Capabilities That Define Functionality of Individuals With Amputation\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M. Bell, Jessica Carrignan, Douglas Kurt Collier, Ji Seung Yang, J. Shim\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction Although the physical abilities associated with activity, exercise, and fitness within the general population of individuals without disabilities have been well established, it is unclear if these abilities define the physical function of individuals with lower-limb amputations (LLAs) who use a prosthesis. A multidimensional definition of the physical function of people with LLA must consider what abilities are necessary and relevant. Objectives This literature review aimed to identify common abilities used to evaluate the physical function of people with LLA. A secondary aim was to evaluate if each identified ability had been indirectly addressed by existing questionnaires and performance-based tests. Study Design Literature Review. Methods Ten common physical abilities associated with measuring the physical function of LLA were identified through literature review. These identified abilities were used to assess what aspects had been indirectly addressed by existing questionnaires and performance-based evaluations of LLA physical function. Results and Conclusions Abilities identified through literature review included agility, balance, comfort, endurance, flexibility, load, maneuverability, power, strength, and symmetry. These 10 abilities are important and commonly used as outcome measures associated with the physical function of people with LLA. Although each ability was addressed by multiple assessments, no assessment addressed all 10 identified abilities. The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee, Rivermead Mobility Index, and the Amputee Mobility Predictor addressed most (8–9 of 10) of the identified abilities. There were clear differences and gaps in the abilities addressed by current assessments, possibly because they rely on an incomplete definition of what is required for LLA physical function. We propose that these 10 abilities are unique and underlie the definition of LLA physical function. However, future work must assess the validity of this proposed framework. Clinical Relevance A multidimensional definition of LLA physical function is necessary to enable more appropriate prosthetic design, prescription, and use. Promoting greater mobility and physical activity levels within this population will improve health of people with LLA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"e9 - e19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然在普通人群中,与活动、锻炼和健康相关的身体能力已经得到了很好的确立,但尚不清楚这些能力是否定义了使用假肢的下肢截肢(LLAs)患者的身体功能。对LLA患者身体功能的多维定义必须考虑哪些能力是必要的和相关的。目的本文献综述旨在确定用于评估LLA患者身体功能的常见能力。第二个目的是评估现有的调查表和基于绩效的测试是否间接涉及了每一种确定的能力。研究设计文献综述。方法通过文献查阅,找出与LLA生理功能测量相关的10种常见体能。这些识别出的能力被用来评估哪些方面已经通过现有的问卷和基于性能的LLA身体功能评估间接解决。结果和结论通过文献综述确定的能力包括敏捷性、平衡性、舒适性、耐力、柔韧性、负荷、机动性、力量、力量和对称性。这10种能力很重要,通常被用作与LLA患者身体功能相关的结果测量。尽管每项能力都经过多次评估,但没有评估涉及所有10项已确定的能力。义肢使用者行动能力调查、截肢者义肢概况、Rivermead行动能力指数和截肢者行动能力预测器解决了大多数(8-9 / 10)确定的能力。目前的评估在处理能力方面存在明显的差异和差距,可能是因为它们依赖于对LLA身体功能所需的不完整定义。我们认为这10种能力是独一无二的,是LLA物理功能定义的基础。然而,未来的工作必须评估这一拟议框架的有效性。对LLA身体功能的多维定义是必要的,以便更合适地设计、处方和使用假体。在这一人群中促进更大的流动性和身体活动水平将改善LLA患者的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Prosthetic Capabilities That Define Functionality of Individuals With Amputation
ABSTRACT Introduction Although the physical abilities associated with activity, exercise, and fitness within the general population of individuals without disabilities have been well established, it is unclear if these abilities define the physical function of individuals with lower-limb amputations (LLAs) who use a prosthesis. A multidimensional definition of the physical function of people with LLA must consider what abilities are necessary and relevant. Objectives This literature review aimed to identify common abilities used to evaluate the physical function of people with LLA. A secondary aim was to evaluate if each identified ability had been indirectly addressed by existing questionnaires and performance-based tests. Study Design Literature Review. Methods Ten common physical abilities associated with measuring the physical function of LLA were identified through literature review. These identified abilities were used to assess what aspects had been indirectly addressed by existing questionnaires and performance-based evaluations of LLA physical function. Results and Conclusions Abilities identified through literature review included agility, balance, comfort, endurance, flexibility, load, maneuverability, power, strength, and symmetry. These 10 abilities are important and commonly used as outcome measures associated with the physical function of people with LLA. Although each ability was addressed by multiple assessments, no assessment addressed all 10 identified abilities. The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility, Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee, Rivermead Mobility Index, and the Amputee Mobility Predictor addressed most (8–9 of 10) of the identified abilities. There were clear differences and gaps in the abilities addressed by current assessments, possibly because they rely on an incomplete definition of what is required for LLA physical function. We propose that these 10 abilities are unique and underlie the definition of LLA physical function. However, future work must assess the validity of this proposed framework. Clinical Relevance A multidimensional definition of LLA physical function is necessary to enable more appropriate prosthetic design, prescription, and use. Promoting greater mobility and physical activity levels within this population will improve health of people with LLA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信