情感的心理建构——一种非本质的科学哲学

IF 3 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Emotion Review Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1177/17540739211058715

P. Zachar

{"title":"情感的心理建构——一种非本质的科学哲学","authors":"P. Zachar","doi":"10.1177/17540739211058715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advocates for the psychological construction of emotion view themselves as articulating a non-essentialist alternative to basic emotion theory's essentialist notion of affect programs. Psychological constructionists have also argued that holding essentialist assumptions about emotions engenders misconceptions about the psychological constructionist viewpoint. If so, it is important to understand what psychological constructionists mean by “essentialism” and “non-essentialism.” To advance the debate, I take a deeper dive into non-essentialism, comparing the non-essentialist views of the early empiricists with those of the psychological constructionists, focusing on the theories of James Russell and Lisa Barrett. Using Lakatos’ notion of scientific research programs, I also describe how Russell's and Barrett's views have evolved into different and potentially competing research programs under the psychological constructionist banner.","PeriodicalId":48064,"journal":{"name":"Emotion Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"3 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Psychological Construction of Emotion – A Non-Essentialist Philosophy of Science\",\"authors\":\"P. Zachar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17540739211058715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advocates for the psychological construction of emotion view themselves as articulating a non-essentialist alternative to basic emotion theory's essentialist notion of affect programs. Psychological constructionists have also argued that holding essentialist assumptions about emotions engenders misconceptions about the psychological constructionist viewpoint. If so, it is important to understand what psychological constructionists mean by “essentialism” and “non-essentialism.” To advance the debate, I take a deeper dive into non-essentialism, comparing the non-essentialist views of the early empiricists with those of the psychological constructionists, focusing on the theories of James Russell and Lisa Barrett. Using Lakatos’ notion of scientific research programs, I also describe how Russell's and Barrett's views have evolved into different and potentially competing research programs under the psychological constructionist banner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emotion Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emotion Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739211058715\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739211058715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

情感心理建构的倡导者认为，他们提出了一种非本质主义的替代方案，以取代基本情感理论的情感程序本质主义概念。心理建构主义者还认为，持有情绪的本质主义假设会导致对心理建构主义观点的误解。如果是这样，那么理解心理建构主义者所说的“本质主义”和“非本质主义”是什么就很重要了。为了推进辩论，我对非本质主义进行了更深入的探讨，比较了早期经验主义者的非本质主义观点与心理建构主义者的观点，重点讨论了詹姆斯·罗素(James Russell)和丽莎·巴雷特(Lisa Barrett)的理论。利用拉卡托斯的科学研究项目概念，我还描述了罗素和巴雷特的观点是如何在心理建构主义的旗帜下演变成不同的、潜在的竞争研究项目的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Psychological Construction of Emotion – A Non-Essentialist Philosophy of Science

Advocates for the psychological construction of emotion view themselves as articulating a non-essentialist alternative to basic emotion theory's essentialist notion of affect programs. Psychological constructionists have also argued that holding essentialist assumptions about emotions engenders misconceptions about the psychological constructionist viewpoint. If so, it is important to understand what psychological constructionists mean by “essentialism” and “non-essentialism.” To advance the debate, I take a deeper dive into non-essentialism, comparing the non-essentialist views of the early empiricists with those of the psychological constructionists, focusing on the theories of James Russell and Lisa Barrett. Using Lakatos’ notion of scientific research programs, I also describe how Russell's and Barrett's views have evolved into different and potentially competing research programs under the psychological constructionist banner.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Emotion Review PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

3.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Emotion Review is a fully peer reviewed scholarly journal. It adheres to a blinded peer review process in which the reviewer"s name is routinely withheld from the author unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only those papers that meet the scientific and editorial standards of the journal, and fit within the aims and scope of the journal, will be sent for outside review. Emotion Review will focus on ideas about emotion, with "emotion" broadly defined. The Review will publish articles presenting new theories, offering conceptual analyses, reviewing the literature, and debating and critiquing conceptual issues.