泰国作为社区司法替代方案的冲突解决做法

Q2 Social Sciences
Sutham Cheurprakobkit, Seksan Khruakham
{"title":"泰国作为社区司法替代方案的冲突解决做法","authors":"Sutham Cheurprakobkit, Seksan Khruakham","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2021.1967150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In response to recent issues of prison overcrowding (over 300,000 inmates in prisons with only 110,000 capacity) and court case overloading, Thailand has implemented the conflict resolution practice, including enacting a new law on dispute mediation, as a community justice alternative to reduce cases and prevent them from going into the main criminal justice system. No empirical research has yet been conducted in Thailand to examine the current forms and status of these conflict resolution mechanisms and problems facing the implementation process. Researchers collected qualitative data by interviewing 16 experts and conducting a focus group with 23 experts. The study’s findings revealed five existing mechanisms on conflict resolution across the country, two of which were recently established thanks to the Dispute Mediation Act of 2019. While the study’s findings identified many issues facing the implementation of the conflict resolution process, the main ones were the lack of trained personnel, the lack of adequate data management, insufficient operating budget, and the absence of public awareness and public confidence.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"389 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The conflict resolution practice as a community justice alternative in Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Sutham Cheurprakobkit, Seksan Khruakham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10282580.2021.1967150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In response to recent issues of prison overcrowding (over 300,000 inmates in prisons with only 110,000 capacity) and court case overloading, Thailand has implemented the conflict resolution practice, including enacting a new law on dispute mediation, as a community justice alternative to reduce cases and prevent them from going into the main criminal justice system. No empirical research has yet been conducted in Thailand to examine the current forms and status of these conflict resolution mechanisms and problems facing the implementation process. Researchers collected qualitative data by interviewing 16 experts and conducting a focus group with 23 experts. The study’s findings revealed five existing mechanisms on conflict resolution across the country, two of which were recently established thanks to the Dispute Mediation Act of 2019. While the study’s findings identified many issues facing the implementation of the conflict resolution process, the main ones were the lack of trained personnel, the lack of adequate data management, insufficient operating budget, and the absence of public awareness and public confidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Justice Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"389 - 408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Justice Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2021.1967150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2021.1967150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要针对最近监狱人满为患(容纳人数只有11万人的监狱中有30多万囚犯)和法院案件过载的问题,泰国实施了解决冲突的做法,包括颁布一项新的纠纷调解法,作为社区司法的替代方案,以减少案件并防止其进入主要的刑事司法系统。泰国尚未进行实证研究,以审查这些冲突解决机制的当前形式和现状以及执行过程中面临的问题。研究人员通过采访16名专家和23名专家组成的焦点小组收集了定性数据。该研究结果揭示了全国现有的五个冲突解决机制,其中两个是最近根据2019年《争端调解法》建立的。虽然研究结果确定了冲突解决进程实施过程中面临的许多问题,但主要问题是缺乏训练有素的人员、缺乏充分的数据管理、业务预算不足以及缺乏公众意识和公众信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The conflict resolution practice as a community justice alternative in Thailand
ABSTRACT In response to recent issues of prison overcrowding (over 300,000 inmates in prisons with only 110,000 capacity) and court case overloading, Thailand has implemented the conflict resolution practice, including enacting a new law on dispute mediation, as a community justice alternative to reduce cases and prevent them from going into the main criminal justice system. No empirical research has yet been conducted in Thailand to examine the current forms and status of these conflict resolution mechanisms and problems facing the implementation process. Researchers collected qualitative data by interviewing 16 experts and conducting a focus group with 23 experts. The study’s findings revealed five existing mechanisms on conflict resolution across the country, two of which were recently established thanks to the Dispute Mediation Act of 2019. While the study’s findings identified many issues facing the implementation of the conflict resolution process, the main ones were the lack of trained personnel, the lack of adequate data management, insufficient operating budget, and the absence of public awareness and public confidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Justice Review
Contemporary Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信