ChatGPT与批判政治学的技术本体论

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Davide Panagia
{"title":"ChatGPT与批判政治学的技术本体论","authors":"Davide Panagia","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2023.2240604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The following paper asks what forms of critical political science are possible given the advent of Machine Learning algorithms like ChatGPT? The technical conditions that provoke this question stem from the fact that such automated systems do not generate identities and representations (as do traditional media with which critical political science conventionally contends) but produce instead rendered outputs based on Bayesian probability calculations. Thus the challenge before us is to theorize criticism vis-a-vis the technical ontologies of the algorithm dispositif.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"555 - 558"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT and the Technical Ontologies of Critical Political Science\",\"authors\":\"Davide Panagia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07393148.2023.2240604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The following paper asks what forms of critical political science are possible given the advent of Machine Learning algorithms like ChatGPT? The technical conditions that provoke this question stem from the fact that such automated systems do not generate identities and representations (as do traditional media with which critical political science conventionally contends) but produce instead rendered outputs based on Bayesian probability calculations. Thus the challenge before us is to theorize criticism vis-a-vis the technical ontologies of the algorithm dispositif.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"555 - 558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2240604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2240604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下面的文章提出了这样一个问题:鉴于像ChatGPT这样的机器学习算法的出现,什么形式的批判性政治学是可能的?引发这个问题的技术条件源于这样一个事实,即这种自动化系统不产生身份和表征(就像批判政治科学通常认为的传统媒体那样),而是产生基于贝叶斯概率计算的呈现输出。因此,摆在我们面前的挑战是对算法配置的技术本体论进行理论化批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ChatGPT and the Technical Ontologies of Critical Political Science
Abstract The following paper asks what forms of critical political science are possible given the advent of Machine Learning algorithms like ChatGPT? The technical conditions that provoke this question stem from the fact that such automated systems do not generate identities and representations (as do traditional media with which critical political science conventionally contends) but produce instead rendered outputs based on Bayesian probability calculations. Thus the challenge before us is to theorize criticism vis-a-vis the technical ontologies of the algorithm dispositif.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信