精神病的标志:走向妄想类型问题的综合

Q3 Medicine
Pablo López-Silva
{"title":"精神病的标志:走向妄想类型问题的综合","authors":"Pablo López-Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although delusions are regarded as the mark of psychosis, their observation in clinical contexts still leads to a number of empirical and conceptual debates. In this context, the typology debate tries to answer the question about the specific type of mental state instantiated by delusional beliefs. Answers to this debate are fundamental, particularly in terms of guiding empirical research on the aetiology and treatment of delusions. This article explores three approaches to this discussion. After examining all the strengths and weaknesses, suggestions are made about how these approaches – commonly depicted as rivals in current literature – might work together to gain a more complex, fruitful, and contextualised understanding of delusions in the context of psychosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages S183-S189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La marca de la psicosis: hacia una síntesis del problema tipológico de los delirios\",\"authors\":\"Pablo López-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcp.2021.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although delusions are regarded as the mark of psychosis, their observation in clinical contexts still leads to a number of empirical and conceptual debates. In this context, the typology debate tries to answer the question about the specific type of mental state instantiated by delusional beliefs. Answers to this debate are fundamental, particularly in terms of guiding empirical research on the aetiology and treatment of delusions. This article explores three approaches to this discussion. After examining all the strengths and weaknesses, suggestions are made about how these approaches – commonly depicted as rivals in current literature – might work together to gain a more complex, fruitful, and contextualised understanding of delusions in the context of psychosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S183-S189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021001724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745021001724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管妄想被认为是精神病的标志,但在临床环境中观察妄想仍然会引发许多经验和概念上的争论。在这种情况下,类型学辩论试图回答妄想信念所体现的精神状态的具体类型。这一争论的答案至关重要,尤其是在指导有关妄想症病因和治疗的实证研究方面。本文探讨了这一讨论的三种方法。在研究了所有的优缺点之后,本文就这些方法(在当前的文献中通常被描述为竞争对手)如何共同合作,以获得对精神病背景下妄想的更复杂、更富有成果和更符合实际情况的理解提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La marca de la psicosis: hacia una síntesis del problema tipológico de los delirios

Although delusions are regarded as the mark of psychosis, their observation in clinical contexts still leads to a number of empirical and conceptual debates. In this context, the typology debate tries to answer the question about the specific type of mental state instantiated by delusional beliefs. Answers to this debate are fundamental, particularly in terms of guiding empirical research on the aetiology and treatment of delusions. This article explores three approaches to this discussion. After examining all the strengths and weaknesses, suggestions are made about how these approaches – commonly depicted as rivals in current literature – might work together to gain a more complex, fruitful, and contextualised understanding of delusions in the context of psychosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信