不排水固结条件下饱和石灰处理塑性粘土的三轴拉伸和压缩试验

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Kuchvichea Kan , Bertrand François
{"title":"不排水固结条件下饱和石灰处理塑性粘土的三轴拉伸和压缩试验","authors":"Kuchvichea Kan ,&nbsp;Bertrand François","doi":"10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lime-treatment of clayey soil significantly increases its shear and tensile strengths. Consequently, the tensile strength of lime-treated soils deserves careful investigation because it may provide an appreciable benefit for the stability of earth structures. This study investigates the tensile and shear strengths of an untreated and lime-treated (3% of lime) plastic clay at different curing times (7 d, 56 d and 300 d), through triaxial tension and compression tests. Triaxial tension tests are performed using “diabolo-shaped” soil samples with reduced central section, such that the central part of the specimen can be under axial tension while both end-sections remain in axial compression. Consolidated undrained (CU) conditions with measurement of pore water pressure allow analyzing the failure conditions through effective stress and total stress approaches. The results of triaxial tension tests reveal that the failure occurs under tensile mode at low confining pressure while extensional shear failure mode is observed under higher confining pressure. Consequently, a classical Mohr-Coulomb shear failure criterion must be combined with a cut-off tensile strength criterion that is not affected by the confining pressure. When comparing shear failure under compression and tension, a slight anisotropy is observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54219,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"15 12","pages":"Pages 3328-3342"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523001373/pdfft?md5=ab922b5f06aa850837650a0174fc63e2&pid=1-s2.0-S1674775523001373-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triaxial tension and compression tests on saturated lime-treated plastic clay upon consolidated undrained conditions\",\"authors\":\"Kuchvichea Kan ,&nbsp;Bertrand François\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lime-treatment of clayey soil significantly increases its shear and tensile strengths. Consequently, the tensile strength of lime-treated soils deserves careful investigation because it may provide an appreciable benefit for the stability of earth structures. This study investigates the tensile and shear strengths of an untreated and lime-treated (3% of lime) plastic clay at different curing times (7 d, 56 d and 300 d), through triaxial tension and compression tests. Triaxial tension tests are performed using “diabolo-shaped” soil samples with reduced central section, such that the central part of the specimen can be under axial tension while both end-sections remain in axial compression. Consolidated undrained (CU) conditions with measurement of pore water pressure allow analyzing the failure conditions through effective stress and total stress approaches. The results of triaxial tension tests reveal that the failure occurs under tensile mode at low confining pressure while extensional shear failure mode is observed under higher confining pressure. Consequently, a classical Mohr-Coulomb shear failure criterion must be combined with a cut-off tensile strength criterion that is not affected by the confining pressure. When comparing shear failure under compression and tension, a slight anisotropy is observed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"15 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3328-3342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523001373/pdfft?md5=ab922b5f06aa850837650a0174fc63e2&pid=1-s2.0-S1674775523001373-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523001373\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775523001373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

石灰处理能显著提高粘土的抗剪强度和抗拉强度。因此,石灰处理土壤的抗拉强度值得仔细研究,因为它可以为土结构的稳定性提供可观的好处。本研究通过三轴拉伸和压缩试验,研究了未经处理和石灰处理(石灰含量为3%)的塑性粘土在不同养护时间(7 d、56 d和300 d)下的抗拉和抗剪强度。三轴拉伸试验采用“空竹形”土样进行,中间部分减小,这样试样的中心部分可以处于轴向拉伸状态,而两端部分仍处于轴向压缩状态。具有孔隙水压力测量的固结不排水(CU)条件允许通过有效应力和总应力方法分析破坏条件。三轴拉伸试验结果表明,低围压条件下土体以拉伸破坏模式破坏,高围压条件下土体以拉伸剪切破坏模式破坏。因此,经典的莫尔-库仑剪切破坏准则必须与不受围压影响的截止抗拉强度准则相结合。当比较压缩和拉伸作用下的剪切破坏时,观察到轻微的各向异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Triaxial tension and compression tests on saturated lime-treated plastic clay upon consolidated undrained conditions

Lime-treatment of clayey soil significantly increases its shear and tensile strengths. Consequently, the tensile strength of lime-treated soils deserves careful investigation because it may provide an appreciable benefit for the stability of earth structures. This study investigates the tensile and shear strengths of an untreated and lime-treated (3% of lime) plastic clay at different curing times (7 d, 56 d and 300 d), through triaxial tension and compression tests. Triaxial tension tests are performed using “diabolo-shaped” soil samples with reduced central section, such that the central part of the specimen can be under axial tension while both end-sections remain in axial compression. Consolidated undrained (CU) conditions with measurement of pore water pressure allow analyzing the failure conditions through effective stress and total stress approaches. The results of triaxial tension tests reveal that the failure occurs under tensile mode at low confining pressure while extensional shear failure mode is observed under higher confining pressure. Consequently, a classical Mohr-Coulomb shear failure criterion must be combined with a cut-off tensile strength criterion that is not affected by the confining pressure. When comparing shear failure under compression and tension, a slight anisotropy is observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
227
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (JRMGE), overseen by the Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, is dedicated to the latest advancements in rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It serves as a platform for global scholars to stay updated on developments in various related fields including soil mechanics, foundation engineering, civil engineering, mining engineering, hydraulic engineering, petroleum engineering, and engineering geology. With a focus on fostering international academic exchange, JRMGE acts as a conduit between theoretical advancements and practical applications. Topics covered include new theories, technologies, methods, experiences, in-situ and laboratory tests, developments, case studies, and timely reviews within the realm of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信