协商数字反乌托邦:情感、氛围和社会联系在物理和数字环境下信息使用决策中的作用

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
C. Warwick
{"title":"协商数字反乌托邦:情感、氛围和社会联系在物理和数字环境下信息使用决策中的作用","authors":"C. Warwick","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2021.1964550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During the pandemic we have found that the experience of interaction online, whether with other people, or with information is very different from what we do in person. And this experience is seldom compared favourably to physical, interaction. Thanks to the A level algorithm fiasco, algorithms are treated with growing scepticism and social media is increasingly regarded as intrinsically toxic associated with deadly misinformation, racism and hate speech. Yet, as information professionals know, digital delivery is ideal for certain types of information, such as journal articles or digital images of rare manuscripts. AI offers the potential to interrogate and make connections between digital collections at an unprecedented scale. But can we build trust if users regard digital interaction and computational techniques with scepticism or even hostility? This article will explore these questions, and consider the importance of emotion and affect in interaction with digital and physical information environments.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"27 1","pages":"259 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiating the Digital Dystopia: The Role of Emotion, Atmosphere and Social Contact in Making Decisions about Information Use in Physical and Digital Contexts\",\"authors\":\"C. Warwick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13614533.2021.1964550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract During the pandemic we have found that the experience of interaction online, whether with other people, or with information is very different from what we do in person. And this experience is seldom compared favourably to physical, interaction. Thanks to the A level algorithm fiasco, algorithms are treated with growing scepticism and social media is increasingly regarded as intrinsically toxic associated with deadly misinformation, racism and hate speech. Yet, as information professionals know, digital delivery is ideal for certain types of information, such as journal articles or digital images of rare manuscripts. AI offers the potential to interrogate and make connections between digital collections at an unprecedented scale. But can we build trust if users regard digital interaction and computational techniques with scepticism or even hostility? This article will explore these questions, and consider the importance of emotion and affect in interaction with digital and physical information environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"259 - 279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1964550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1964550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在大流行期间,我们发现在线互动的体验,无论是与其他人还是与信息互动,都与我们亲自进行的互动大不相同。这种体验很少能与身体上的互动相比。由于A - level算法的惨败,算法受到了越来越多的怀疑,社交媒体也越来越被视为与致命的错误信息、种族主义和仇恨言论有关的内在毒素。然而,正如信息专业人士所知,数字传输对于某些类型的信息是理想的,例如期刊文章或稀有手稿的数字图像。人工智能以前所未有的规模提供了查询和连接数字收藏的潜力。但是,如果用户对数字交互和计算技术持怀疑甚至敌意,我们还能建立信任吗?本文将探讨这些问题,并考虑情感和影响在与数字和物理信息环境交互中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negotiating the Digital Dystopia: The Role of Emotion, Atmosphere and Social Contact in Making Decisions about Information Use in Physical and Digital Contexts
Abstract During the pandemic we have found that the experience of interaction online, whether with other people, or with information is very different from what we do in person. And this experience is seldom compared favourably to physical, interaction. Thanks to the A level algorithm fiasco, algorithms are treated with growing scepticism and social media is increasingly regarded as intrinsically toxic associated with deadly misinformation, racism and hate speech. Yet, as information professionals know, digital delivery is ideal for certain types of information, such as journal articles or digital images of rare manuscripts. AI offers the potential to interrogate and make connections between digital collections at an unprecedented scale. But can we build trust if users regard digital interaction and computational techniques with scepticism or even hostility? This article will explore these questions, and consider the importance of emotion and affect in interaction with digital and physical information environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信