齐声说话?使用基于网络的方法解释议程设定者星座在欧洲央行政策议程中的作用

IF 4.6 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
J. Cross, Derek Greene, N. Umansky, Silvia Calò
{"title":"齐声说话?使用基于网络的方法解释议程设定者星座在欧洲央行政策议程中的作用","authors":"J. Cross, Derek Greene, N. Umansky, Silvia Calò","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2242891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy agendas are a well-studied institutional level phenomenon that capture the set of policy issues that an institution pays attention to over time. They are emergent in nature in that individual behaviour shapes institutionallevel outcomes when policy makers allocate attention to policy issues. To examine the link between individual-level actions and system-level outcomes we introduce the concept of the agenda-setting constellation, defined as a group of policy makers paying attention to a set of policy issues. Taking the European Central Bank as a case study, and using a combination of text-analysis and networks-analysis techniques, we demonstrate how these meso-level structures shape the evolving policy agenda. We then examine the roles of personal experience, institutional constraints, and policy context in driving agenda-setter constellation membership. Our results show the value of studying policy agendas as networked processes and the key role that agenda-setter constellations play in driving policy agenda dynamics. *Connected Politics Lab, School of Politics & International Relations, University College Dublin, Ireland. (james.cross@ucd.ie) Corresponding author. †Insight Centre for Data Analytics & School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland. (derek.greene@ucd.ie) ‡Digital Democracy Lab, University of Zurich, Switzerland. (umansky@ipz.uzh.ch) §European Stability Mechanism, Luxembourg. (s.calo@esm.europa.eu) The views expressed in this paper are personal and do not represent the views of the European Stability Mechanism.","PeriodicalId":51362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Public Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speaking in unison? Explaining the role of agenda-setter constellations in the ECB policy agenda using a network-based approach\",\"authors\":\"J. Cross, Derek Greene, N. Umansky, Silvia Calò\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13501763.2023.2242891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policy agendas are a well-studied institutional level phenomenon that capture the set of policy issues that an institution pays attention to over time. They are emergent in nature in that individual behaviour shapes institutionallevel outcomes when policy makers allocate attention to policy issues. To examine the link between individual-level actions and system-level outcomes we introduce the concept of the agenda-setting constellation, defined as a group of policy makers paying attention to a set of policy issues. Taking the European Central Bank as a case study, and using a combination of text-analysis and networks-analysis techniques, we demonstrate how these meso-level structures shape the evolving policy agenda. We then examine the roles of personal experience, institutional constraints, and policy context in driving agenda-setter constellation membership. Our results show the value of studying policy agendas as networked processes and the key role that agenda-setter constellations play in driving policy agenda dynamics. *Connected Politics Lab, School of Politics & International Relations, University College Dublin, Ireland. (james.cross@ucd.ie) Corresponding author. †Insight Centre for Data Analytics & School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland. (derek.greene@ucd.ie) ‡Digital Democracy Lab, University of Zurich, Switzerland. (umansky@ipz.uzh.ch) §European Stability Mechanism, Luxembourg. (s.calo@esm.europa.eu) The views expressed in this paper are personal and do not represent the views of the European Stability Mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Public Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2242891\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2242891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策议程是一个经过充分研究的制度层面现象,它捕捉了一个机构随着时间的推移所关注的一系列政策问题。它们在本质上是突发性的,因为当政策制定者将注意力分配到政策问题上时,个人行为会影响制度层面的结果。为了研究个人层面的行动与系统层面的结果之间的联系,我们引入了议程设置星座的概念,将其定义为关注一系列政策问题的一组政策制定者。以欧洲中央银行为例,结合文本分析和网络分析技术,我们展示了这些中尺度结构如何塑造不断演变的政策议程。然后,我们研究了个人经历、制度约束和政策背景在推动议程制定者星座成员资格方面的作用。我们的研究结果显示了将政策议程作为网络过程进行研究的价值,以及议程设定者群体在推动政策议程动态方面发挥的关键作用。*爱尔兰都柏林大学政治与国际关系学院互联政治实验室。(james.cross@ucd.ie)通讯作者。†爱尔兰都柏林大学数据分析与计算机科学学院洞察中心。(derek.greene@ucd.ie)瑞士苏黎世大学数字民主实验室(umansky@ipz.uzh.ch)§欧洲稳定机制,卢森堡。(s.calo@esm.europa.eu)本文仅代表个人观点,不代表欧洲稳定机制的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speaking in unison? Explaining the role of agenda-setter constellations in the ECB policy agenda using a network-based approach
Policy agendas are a well-studied institutional level phenomenon that capture the set of policy issues that an institution pays attention to over time. They are emergent in nature in that individual behaviour shapes institutionallevel outcomes when policy makers allocate attention to policy issues. To examine the link between individual-level actions and system-level outcomes we introduce the concept of the agenda-setting constellation, defined as a group of policy makers paying attention to a set of policy issues. Taking the European Central Bank as a case study, and using a combination of text-analysis and networks-analysis techniques, we demonstrate how these meso-level structures shape the evolving policy agenda. We then examine the roles of personal experience, institutional constraints, and policy context in driving agenda-setter constellation membership. Our results show the value of studying policy agendas as networked processes and the key role that agenda-setter constellations play in driving policy agenda dynamics. *Connected Politics Lab, School of Politics & International Relations, University College Dublin, Ireland. (james.cross@ucd.ie) Corresponding author. †Insight Centre for Data Analytics & School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland. (derek.greene@ucd.ie) ‡Digital Democracy Lab, University of Zurich, Switzerland. (umansky@ipz.uzh.ch) §European Stability Mechanism, Luxembourg. (s.calo@esm.europa.eu) The views expressed in this paper are personal and do not represent the views of the European Stability Mechanism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the Journal of European Public Policy is to provide a comprehensive and definitive source of analytical, theoretical and methodological articles in the field of European public policy. Focusing on the dynamics of public policy in Europe, the journal encourages a wide range of social science approaches, both qualitative and quantitative. JEPP defines European public policy widely and welcomes innovative ideas and approaches. The main areas covered by the Journal are as follows: •Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of public policy in Europe and elsewhere •National public policy developments and processes in Europe •Comparative studies of public policy within Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信