欧洲逮捕令的替代方案没有得到充分利用吗?欧盟刑事司法领域司法合作机制一体化的案例

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW
J. Ouwerkerk
{"title":"欧洲逮捕令的替代方案没有得到充分利用吗?欧盟刑事司法领域司法合作机制一体化的案例","authors":"J. Ouwerkerk","doi":"10.1163/15718174-29020002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the application of the European arrest warrant (eaw) mechanism, the principles of mutual trust and mutual recognition have come under the pressure of serious fundamental rights concerns in some EU Member States in particular. The latest chapter in a yet unfinished tale has been written on 17 December 2020, when the EU Court of Justice handed down its preliminary ruling in two cases in which Poland had requested the Dutch authorities to surrender two Polish nationals (joined cases L/P).1 In its preliminary ruling, the Court has, amongst other things, upheld the requirement for executing authorities to still carry out the second, individualised, step of the two-step test that has been developed in Aranyosi/Căldăraru and got confirmed in lm.2 It therefore remains required for executing authorities to assess whether there is a real risk that the sought person him/herself will be subject of a breach of the fundamental right in respect of which it was established (under the first element of","PeriodicalId":43762,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Alternatives to the European Arrest Warrant Underused? The Case for an Integrative Approach to Judicial Cooperation Mechanisms in the EU Criminal Justice Area\",\"authors\":\"J. Ouwerkerk\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718174-29020002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the application of the European arrest warrant (eaw) mechanism, the principles of mutual trust and mutual recognition have come under the pressure of serious fundamental rights concerns in some EU Member States in particular. The latest chapter in a yet unfinished tale has been written on 17 December 2020, when the EU Court of Justice handed down its preliminary ruling in two cases in which Poland had requested the Dutch authorities to surrender two Polish nationals (joined cases L/P).1 In its preliminary ruling, the Court has, amongst other things, upheld the requirement for executing authorities to still carry out the second, individualised, step of the two-step test that has been developed in Aranyosi/Căldăraru and got confirmed in lm.2 It therefore remains required for executing authorities to assess whether there is a real risk that the sought person him/herself will be subject of a breach of the fundamental right in respect of which it was established (under the first element of\",\"PeriodicalId\":43762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-29020002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-29020002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在适用欧洲逮捕令机制时,相互信任和相互承认的原则尤其受到一些欧盟成员国严重的基本权利关切的压力。一个尚未完成的故事的最新一章写在2020年12月17日,当时欧盟法院对波兰要求荷兰当局移交两名波兰国民的两起案件(合并案件L/P)作出了初步裁决,坚持执行当局仍需执行第二项、个性化、,在Aranyosi/Căldăraru开发并在lm中得到确认的两步测试的步骤。2因此,执行当局仍需评估被请求引渡人本人是否存在侵犯其基本权利的真正风险(根据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Alternatives to the European Arrest Warrant Underused? The Case for an Integrative Approach to Judicial Cooperation Mechanisms in the EU Criminal Justice Area
In the application of the European arrest warrant (eaw) mechanism, the principles of mutual trust and mutual recognition have come under the pressure of serious fundamental rights concerns in some EU Member States in particular. The latest chapter in a yet unfinished tale has been written on 17 December 2020, when the EU Court of Justice handed down its preliminary ruling in two cases in which Poland had requested the Dutch authorities to surrender two Polish nationals (joined cases L/P).1 In its preliminary ruling, the Court has, amongst other things, upheld the requirement for executing authorities to still carry out the second, individualised, step of the two-step test that has been developed in Aranyosi/Căldăraru and got confirmed in lm.2 It therefore remains required for executing authorities to assess whether there is a real risk that the sought person him/herself will be subject of a breach of the fundamental right in respect of which it was established (under the first element of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信