大学生头痛认知行为模型的拟合性评价

Luciana Sofía Moretti , Valentina Candini , Florencia Cárdenas , Hanne Conn , Franca Fabbro , Roger Muñoz-Navarro , Leonardo Adrián Medrano
{"title":"大学生头痛认知行为模型的拟合性评价","authors":"Luciana Sofía Moretti ,&nbsp;Valentina Candini ,&nbsp;Florencia Cárdenas ,&nbsp;Hanne Conn ,&nbsp;Franca Fabbro ,&nbsp;Roger Muñoz-Navarro ,&nbsp;Leonardo Adrián Medrano","doi":"10.1016/j.jbhsi.2018.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit of a cognitive behavioural model of headache in the population of University students, from Córdoba, Argentina. The direct and indirect contributions to pain intensity of control beliefs, beliefs and thoughts about pain and coping strategies were determined, as were the direct contributions of pain behaviours and disability. The sample was comprised of 382 students of both genders from several Universities. Multiple instruments were administered to measure the variables proposed in the cognitive behavioural model of headache followed by a descriptive and exploratory analysis of the data. Structural equation modelling was used and revealed an acceptable fit of the model but with lower levels than the criteria proposed. The model was therefore redefined by eliminating two indicators and was then found to achieve a better fit (CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.91; GFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.95) and an optimal RMSEA index of .05. The new model explained 47% of the variance of headache intensity. All the variables of the model predicted pain intensity directly, with beliefs and thoughts about pain having the greatest predictive value (<em>β</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.68).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbhsi.2018.01.003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An appraisal of the fit of a cognitive behavioural model of headache in University students\",\"authors\":\"Luciana Sofía Moretti ,&nbsp;Valentina Candini ,&nbsp;Florencia Cárdenas ,&nbsp;Hanne Conn ,&nbsp;Franca Fabbro ,&nbsp;Roger Muñoz-Navarro ,&nbsp;Leonardo Adrián Medrano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbhsi.2018.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit of a cognitive behavioural model of headache in the population of University students, from Córdoba, Argentina. The direct and indirect contributions to pain intensity of control beliefs, beliefs and thoughts about pain and coping strategies were determined, as were the direct contributions of pain behaviours and disability. The sample was comprised of 382 students of both genders from several Universities. Multiple instruments were administered to measure the variables proposed in the cognitive behavioural model of headache followed by a descriptive and exploratory analysis of the data. Structural equation modelling was used and revealed an acceptable fit of the model but with lower levels than the criteria proposed. The model was therefore redefined by eliminating two indicators and was then found to achieve a better fit (CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.91; GFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.95) and an optimal RMSEA index of .05. The new model explained 47% of the variance of headache intensity. All the variables of the model predicted pain intensity directly, with beliefs and thoughts about pain having the greatest predictive value (<em>β</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.68).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 54-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbhsi.2018.01.003\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078018300051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078018300051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是评估来自阿根廷Córdoba的大学生群体中头痛认知行为模型的契合度。研究确定了控制信念、关于疼痛的信念和想法以及应对策略对疼痛强度的直接和间接影响,以及疼痛行为和残疾的直接影响。样本由来自几所大学的382名男女学生组成。使用多种工具来测量头痛认知行为模型中提出的变量,然后对数据进行描述性和探索性分析。结构方程模型的使用和揭示了一个可接受的模型拟合,但低于标准提出的水平。因此,通过消除两个指标来重新定义模型,然后发现模型获得了更好的拟合(CFI = .91;GFI = 0.95),最佳RMSEA指数为0.05。新模型解释了47%的头痛强度差异。模型各变量均能直接预测疼痛强度,其中对疼痛的信念和想法的预测价值最大(β = 0.68)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An appraisal of the fit of a cognitive behavioural model of headache in University students

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit of a cognitive behavioural model of headache in the population of University students, from Córdoba, Argentina. The direct and indirect contributions to pain intensity of control beliefs, beliefs and thoughts about pain and coping strategies were determined, as were the direct contributions of pain behaviours and disability. The sample was comprised of 382 students of both genders from several Universities. Multiple instruments were administered to measure the variables proposed in the cognitive behavioural model of headache followed by a descriptive and exploratory analysis of the data. Structural equation modelling was used and revealed an acceptable fit of the model but with lower levels than the criteria proposed. The model was therefore redefined by eliminating two indicators and was then found to achieve a better fit (CFI = .91; GFI = .95) and an optimal RMSEA index of .05. The new model explained 47% of the variance of headache intensity. All the variables of the model predicted pain intensity directly, with beliefs and thoughts about pain having the greatest predictive value (β = 0.68).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信