解释行为——它们是伟大的法律吗?它们(如何)构成伟大的法律?

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW

Statute Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI:10.1093/SLR/HMAB007

Ross Carter

{"title":"解释行为——它们是伟大的法律吗?它们(如何)构成伟大的法律?","authors":"Ross Carter","doi":"10.1093/SLR/HMAB007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper considers the purposes and evolution of Interpretation Acts, including the following points:\n • how, as default law, they inform and interact with other legislation;\n • their scope as, and interaction with other, interpretation law (including links with interpretation legislation in related jurisdictions);\n • ways they can stop being, or fail to be, great law (that is, law that is accessible, fit for purpose, and constitutionally sound);\n • ways policy-makers and drafters can meet the challenges (in Te Reo Māori: ngā wero) of making them, and all the other law that interacts with them, great law.","PeriodicalId":43737,"journal":{"name":"Statute Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation Acts—Are They, and (How) Do They Make for, Great Law?\",\"authors\":\"Ross Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/SLR/HMAB007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paper considers the purposes and evolution of Interpretation Acts, including the following points:\\n • how, as default law, they inform and interact with other legislation;\\n • their scope as, and interaction with other, interpretation law (including links with interpretation legislation in related jurisdictions);\\n • ways they can stop being, or fail to be, great law (that is, law that is accessible, fit for purpose, and constitutionally sound);\\n • ways policy-makers and drafters can meet the challenges (in Te Reo Māori: ngā wero) of making them, and all the other law that interacts with them, great law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statute Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/SLR/HMAB007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statute Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SLR/HMAB007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考虑了解释法的目的和演变，包括以下几点:•作为默认法律，它们如何通知其他立法并与之互动;•它们作为解释法的范围以及与其他解释法的相互作用(包括与相关司法管辖区的解释立法的联系);•它们可能不再是或无法成为伟大的法律(即可获得的、符合目的的、符合宪法的法律);•政策制定者和起草者如何应对挑战(在Te Reo Māori: ngā wero)，制定这些法律，以及与之相互作用的所有其他法律，成为伟大的法律。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Interpretation Acts—Are They, and (How) Do They Make for, Great Law?

The paper considers the purposes and evolution of Interpretation Acts, including the following points: • how, as default law, they inform and interact with other legislation; • their scope as, and interaction with other, interpretation law (including links with interpretation legislation in related jurisdictions); • ways they can stop being, or fail to be, great law (that is, law that is accessible, fit for purpose, and constitutionally sound); • ways policy-makers and drafters can meet the challenges (in Te Reo Māori: ngā wero) of making them, and all the other law that interacts with them, great law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Statute Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The principal objectives of the Review are to provide a vehicle for the consideration of the legislative process, the use of legislation as an instrument of public policy and of the drafting and interpretation of legislation. The Review, which was first established in 1980, is the only journal of its kind within the Commonwealth. It is of particular value to lawyers in both private practice and in public service, and to academics, both lawyers and political scientists, who write and teach within the field of legislation.