国际商务研究中诠释主义与实证主义的结合:以外派人员角色为例

IF 8.9 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Journal of World Business Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101419

Juan I. Sanchez , Jaime Bonache , Carmen Paz-Aparicio , Celia Zárraga Oberty

{"title":"国际商务研究中诠释主义与实证主义的结合:以外派人员角色为例","authors":"Juan I. Sanchez , Jaime Bonache , Carmen Paz-Aparicio , Celia Zárraga Oberty","doi":"10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We illustrated how multi-paradigm research that combines the phenomenological interpretive and the positivist paradigms in sequential studies helps problematize questionable assumptions in international business research. While observing the phenomenological principle of <em>epoché</em> (i.e., suspension of researchers’ pre-conceived categories), we interpreted accounts of their lived experience amongst expatriates working in foreign subsidiaries. A follow-up positivist study further led us to conclude that, unlike Edström and Galbraith's (1977) reasons for an international assignment, expatriates hardly see themselves as headquarters’ control agents, but as dual agents in charge of balancing both headquarters and subsidiary's interests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Business","volume":"58 2","pages":"Article 101419"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining interpretivism and positivism in international business research: The example of the expatriate role\",\"authors\":\"Juan I. Sanchez , Jaime Bonache , Carmen Paz-Aparicio , Celia Zárraga Oberty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We illustrated how multi-paradigm research that combines the phenomenological interpretive and the positivist paradigms in sequential studies helps problematize questionable assumptions in international business research. While observing the phenomenological principle of <em>epoché</em> (i.e., suspension of researchers’ pre-conceived categories), we interpreted accounts of their lived experience amongst expatriates working in foreign subsidiaries. A follow-up positivist study further led us to conclude that, unlike Edström and Galbraith's (1977) reasons for an international assignment, expatriates hardly see themselves as headquarters’ control agents, but as dual agents in charge of balancing both headquarters and subsidiary's interests.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Business\",\"volume\":\"58 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951622001092\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Business","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951622001092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

我们说明了多范式研究如何结合现象学解释和实证主义范式在顺序研究中帮助解决国际商业研究中有问题的假设。在观察时代变迁的现象学原理(即，暂停研究人员预先设想的类别)的同时，我们解释了他们在外国子公司工作的外籍人士的生活经历。一项后续实证主义研究进一步使我们得出结论，与Edström和Galbraith(1977)的国际派遣理由不同，外派人员几乎不认为自己是总部的控制代理人，而是负责平衡总部和子公司利益的双重代理人。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Combining interpretivism and positivism in international business research: The example of the expatriate role

We illustrated how multi-paradigm research that combines the phenomenological interpretive and the positivist paradigms in sequential studies helps problematize questionable assumptions in international business research. While observing the phenomenological principle of epoché (i.e., suspension of researchers’ pre-conceived categories), we interpreted accounts of their lived experience amongst expatriates working in foreign subsidiaries. A follow-up positivist study further led us to conclude that, unlike Edström and Galbraith's (1977) reasons for an international assignment, expatriates hardly see themselves as headquarters’ control agents, but as dual agents in charge of balancing both headquarters and subsidiary's interests.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of World Business BUSINESS-

CiteScore

16.50

自引率

11.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of World Business holds a distinguished position as a leading publication within the realm of International Business. Rooted in a legacy dating back to 1965, when it was established as the Columbia Journal of World Business, JWB is committed to disseminating cutting-edge research that reflects significant advancements in the field. The journal actively seeks submissions that propel new theoretical frameworks and innovative perspectives on International Business phenomena. Aligned with its domain statement, submissions are expected to possess a clear multinational, cross-border, or international comparative focus, while remaining pertinent to the study of management and organizations. JWB particularly encourages submissions that challenge established theories or assumptions, presenting pioneering or counterintuitive findings. With an inclusive approach, the journal welcomes contributions from diverse conceptual and theoretical traditions, encompassing allied social sciences and behavioral sciences. Submissions should either develop new theories or rigorously test existing ones, employing a variety of qualitative, quantitative, or other methodological approaches. While JWB primarily caters to scholars and researchers, it values contributions that explore implications for Multinational Enterprises and their management, as well as ramifications for public policy and the broader societal role of business.