多样化馆藏期刊排名指标之间的关系

IF 1.8 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Performance Measurement and Metrics Pub Date : 2017-11-10 DOI:10.1108/PMM-10-2016-0042

Upeksha Perera, Manjula Wijewickrema

{"title":"多样化馆藏期刊排名指标之间的关系","authors":"Upeksha Perera, Manjula Wijewickrema","doi":"10.1108/PMM-10-2016-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nRanking of scholarly journals is important for many parties owing to numerous reasons. Studying the relationships among various ranking metrics is the key to understand the performance of one metric based on another. Therefore, the aim of this research is to investigate the relationship among four major journal ranking methods, namely: Impact Factor (IF), Eigenfactor Score (ES), h-index (hI), and SCImagoJournal Rank (SJR). \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThe paper investigates 519 journals from a diverse range of subjects to execute a comprehensive correlation analysis. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe results show that there exists a higher correlation between the IF and SJR (0.796). However, a very strong positive correlation among two metrics does not necessarily imply that the journals are ranked in the similar pattern. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe first study which discusses the journal ranking relationships in a diversified collection and the inability of comparing correlations between metric values and the correlations between corresponding journal ranks.","PeriodicalId":44583,"journal":{"name":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","volume":"1 1","pages":"00-00"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between Journal Ranking Metrics in a Diversified Collection\",\"authors\":\"Upeksha Perera, Manjula Wijewickrema\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/PMM-10-2016-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nRanking of scholarly journals is important for many parties owing to numerous reasons. Studying the relationships among various ranking metrics is the key to understand the performance of one metric based on another. Therefore, the aim of this research is to investigate the relationship among four major journal ranking methods, namely: Impact Factor (IF), Eigenfactor Score (ES), h-index (hI), and SCImagoJournal Rank (SJR). \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe paper investigates 519 journals from a diverse range of subjects to execute a comprehensive correlation analysis. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe results show that there exists a higher correlation between the IF and SJR (0.796). However, a very strong positive correlation among two metrics does not necessarily imply that the journals are ranked in the similar pattern. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe first study which discusses the journal ranking relationships in a diversified collection and the inability of comparing correlations between metric values and the correlations between corresponding journal ranks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Performance Measurement and Metrics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"00-00\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Performance Measurement and Metrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2016-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2016-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

由于多种原因，学术期刊的排名对各方来说都很重要。研究各种排名指标之间的关系是理解一个指标基于另一个指标的性能的关键。因此，本研究的目的是调查四种主要期刊排名方法之间的关系，即：影响因子（IF）、特征因子得分（ES）、h指数（hI）和SCImagoJournal排名（SJR）。设计/方法论/方法本文调查了来自不同主题的519种期刊，以进行全面的相关性分析。研究结果表明，IF和SJR之间存在更高的相关性（0.796）。然而，两个指标之间非常强的正相关性并不一定意味着期刊的排名模式相似。原创性/价值第一项研究讨论了多样化收藏中的期刊排名关系，以及无法比较度量值之间的相关性和相应期刊排名之间的相关性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Relationship between Journal Ranking Metrics in a Diversified Collection

Purpose Ranking of scholarly journals is important for many parties owing to numerous reasons. Studying the relationships among various ranking metrics is the key to understand the performance of one metric based on another. Therefore, the aim of this research is to investigate the relationship among four major journal ranking methods, namely: Impact Factor (IF), Eigenfactor Score (ES), h-index (hI), and SCImagoJournal Rank (SJR). Design/methodology/approach The paper investigates 519 journals from a diverse range of subjects to execute a comprehensive correlation analysis. Findings The results show that there exists a higher correlation between the IF and SJR (0.796). However, a very strong positive correlation among two metrics does not necessarily imply that the journals are ranked in the similar pattern. Originality/value The first study which discusses the journal ranking relationships in a diversified collection and the inability of comparing correlations between metric values and the correlations between corresponding journal ranks.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Performance Measurement and Metrics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： ■Quantitative and qualitative analysis ■Benchmarking ■The measurement and role of information in enhancing organizational effectiveness ■Quality techniques and quality improvement ■Training and education ■Methods for performance measurement and metrics ■Standard assessment tools ■Using emerging technologies ■Setting standards or service quality