推特上对COVID - 19大流行的关注:美国州议员之间的党派分歧

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Taegyoon Kim, Nitheesha Nakka, Ishita Gopal, Bruce A. Desmarais, Abigail Mancinelli, Jeffrey J. Harden, Hyein Ko, Frederick J. Boehmke
{"title":"推特上对COVID - 19大流行的关注:美国州议员之间的党派分歧","authors":"Taegyoon Kim,&nbsp;Nitheesha Nakka,&nbsp;Ishita Gopal,&nbsp;Bruce A. Desmarais,&nbsp;Abigail Mancinelli,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. Harden,&nbsp;Hyein Ko,&nbsp;Frederick J. Boehmke","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Subnational governments in the United States have taken the lead on many aspects of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Variation in government activity across states offers the opportunity to analyze responses in comparable settings. We study a common and informative activity among state officials—state legislators’ attention to the pandemic on Twitter. We find that legislators’ attention to the pandemic strongly correlates with the number of cases in the legislator’s state, the national count of new deaths, and the number of pandemic-related public policies passed within the legislator’s state. Furthermore, we find that the degree of responsiveness to pandemic indicators differs significantly across political parties, with Republicans exhibiting weaker responses, on average. Lastly, we find significant differences in the content of tweets about the pandemic by Democratic and Republican legislators, with Democrats focused on health indicators and impacts, and Republicans focused on business impacts and opening the economy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"47 4","pages":"1023-1041"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lsq.12367","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attention to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Partisan Differences Among U.S. State Legislators\",\"authors\":\"Taegyoon Kim,&nbsp;Nitheesha Nakka,&nbsp;Ishita Gopal,&nbsp;Bruce A. Desmarais,&nbsp;Abigail Mancinelli,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. Harden,&nbsp;Hyein Ko,&nbsp;Frederick J. Boehmke\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lsq.12367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Subnational governments in the United States have taken the lead on many aspects of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Variation in government activity across states offers the opportunity to analyze responses in comparable settings. We study a common and informative activity among state officials—state legislators’ attention to the pandemic on Twitter. We find that legislators’ attention to the pandemic strongly correlates with the number of cases in the legislator’s state, the national count of new deaths, and the number of pandemic-related public policies passed within the legislator’s state. Furthermore, we find that the degree of responsiveness to pandemic indicators differs significantly across political parties, with Republicans exhibiting weaker responses, on average. Lastly, we find significant differences in the content of tweets about the pandemic by Democratic and Republican legislators, with Democrats focused on health indicators and impacts, and Republicans focused on business impacts and opening the economy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legislative Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"1023-1041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lsq.12367\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legislative Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lsq.12367\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lsq.12367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

美国地方政府在应对COVID-19大流行的许多方面发挥了带头作用。各州政府活动的差异为分析在可比环境下的反应提供了机会。我们研究了州官员中一个常见的、信息量大的活动——州议员在Twitter上对疫情的关注。我们发现,立法者对大流行的关注与立法者所在州的病例数、全国新增死亡人数以及立法者所在州内通过的与大流行相关的公共政策的数量密切相关。此外,我们发现各政党对流行病指标的反应程度差异很大,平均而言,共和党人的反应较弱。最后,我们发现民主党和共和党议员关于疫情的推文内容存在显著差异,民主党关注的是健康指标和影响,共和党关注的是商业影响和开放经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Attention to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Partisan Differences Among U.S. State Legislators

Attention to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Partisan Differences Among U.S. State Legislators

Subnational governments in the United States have taken the lead on many aspects of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Variation in government activity across states offers the opportunity to analyze responses in comparable settings. We study a common and informative activity among state officials—state legislators’ attention to the pandemic on Twitter. We find that legislators’ attention to the pandemic strongly correlates with the number of cases in the legislator’s state, the national count of new deaths, and the number of pandemic-related public policies passed within the legislator’s state. Furthermore, we find that the degree of responsiveness to pandemic indicators differs significantly across political parties, with Republicans exhibiting weaker responses, on average. Lastly, we find significant differences in the content of tweets about the pandemic by Democratic and Republican legislators, with Democrats focused on health indicators and impacts, and Republicans focused on business impacts and opening the economy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Legislative Studies Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Legislative Studies Quarterly is an international journal devoted to the publication of research on representative assemblies. Its purpose is to disseminate scholarly work on parliaments and legislatures, their relations to other political institutions, their functions in the political system, and the activities of their members both within the institution and outside. Contributions are invited from scholars in all countries. The pages of the Quarterly are open to all research approaches consistent with the normal canons of scholarship, and to work on representative assemblies in all settings and all time periods. The aim of the journal is to contribute to the formulation and verification of general theories about legislative systems, processes, and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信