葡萄牙法律体系中对干预利润问题的解决方案

Sabrina Soares da Silva, R. Silva
{"title":"葡萄牙法律体系中对干预利润问题的解决方案","authors":"Sabrina Soares da Silva, R. Silva","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2020V41N86P222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem that involves interventions in the subjective rights, especially the profit of intervention, has been receiving special attention of the brazilian doctrine. Thus, in order to contribute to possible solutions tothe Brazilian legal system, this article aims to portray another legal system, the portuguese legal system, which for almost four decades has been debating the problem, providing a deeper understanding to the issue. Therefore, the deductive method is the research methodology used throughout the article. It is possible toconclude that Portuguese legal scholars have largely stand for the categorization of the profit of intervention within the scope of theunjustified enrichment, but they diverge on the possibility of its restitution, and specific lawson immaterial rights have inserted the profit of intervention as a way for calculating damages.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"41 1","pages":"222-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"As soluções traçadas no Ordenamento Jurídico Português para o problema do lucro da intervenção\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Soares da Silva, R. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2020V41N86P222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem that involves interventions in the subjective rights, especially the profit of intervention, has been receiving special attention of the brazilian doctrine. Thus, in order to contribute to possible solutions tothe Brazilian legal system, this article aims to portray another legal system, the portuguese legal system, which for almost four decades has been debating the problem, providing a deeper understanding to the issue. Therefore, the deductive method is the research methodology used throughout the article. It is possible toconclude that Portuguese legal scholars have largely stand for the categorization of the profit of intervention within the scope of theunjustified enrichment, but they diverge on the possibility of its restitution, and specific lawson immaterial rights have inserted the profit of intervention as a way for calculating damages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"222-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2020V41N86P222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2020V41N86P222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

涉及干预主观权利的问题,特别是干预的利益问题,一直受到巴西主义的特别关注。因此,为了对巴西法律体系的可能解决方案做出贡献,本文旨在描绘另一个法律体系,葡萄牙法律体系,近四十年来一直在争论这个问题,提供对这个问题更深入的理解。因此,演绎法是贯穿全文的研究方法论。可以得出这样的结论:葡萄牙法律学者基本上支持在不正当得利范围内对干预利润的分类,但他们在其恢复的可能性上存在分歧,并且具体的非物质权利已经将干预利润作为计算损害赔偿的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
As soluções traçadas no Ordenamento Jurídico Português para o problema do lucro da intervenção
The problem that involves interventions in the subjective rights, especially the profit of intervention, has been receiving special attention of the brazilian doctrine. Thus, in order to contribute to possible solutions tothe Brazilian legal system, this article aims to portray another legal system, the portuguese legal system, which for almost four decades has been debating the problem, providing a deeper understanding to the issue. Therefore, the deductive method is the research methodology used throughout the article. It is possible toconclude that Portuguese legal scholars have largely stand for the categorization of the profit of intervention within the scope of theunjustified enrichment, but they diverge on the possibility of its restitution, and specific lawson immaterial rights have inserted the profit of intervention as a way for calculating damages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信