农业生态学中的争议话题:欧洲视角

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
P. Migliorini, P. Bàrberi, S. Bellon, Tommaso Gaifami, V. Gkisakis, A. Peeters, A. Wezel
{"title":"农业生态学中的争议话题:欧洲视角","authors":"P. Migliorini, P. Bàrberi, S. Bellon, Tommaso Gaifami, V. Gkisakis, A. Peeters, A. Wezel","doi":"10.7764/ijanr.v47i3.2265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seven potential controversial topics in agroecology are presented and discussed from a European perspective comparing the position of Agroecology Europe (AEEU) obtained from an iterative, participatory approach with members and compared with published literature, including views from other parts of the world. The seven controversial topics as follows: i) use of agrochemicals; ii) small-scale and peasant farming versus larger farms; iii) technological innovations in agriculture and precision farming; iv) biotechnology and genetic engineering in agriculture; v) local and short food circuits; vi) social justice; vii) gender perspective. The analysis shows that there are diverse points of view related to geographical area and sociopolitical contexts. However, there are several convergences in the ambition to redesign farming and food systems, as a lever acting on several topics, and in considering agroecology with a holistic, participatory, multiactor approach for the needed transition.","PeriodicalId":48477,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversial topics in agroecology: A European perspective\",\"authors\":\"P. Migliorini, P. Bàrberi, S. Bellon, Tommaso Gaifami, V. Gkisakis, A. Peeters, A. Wezel\",\"doi\":\"10.7764/ijanr.v47i3.2265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seven potential controversial topics in agroecology are presented and discussed from a European perspective comparing the position of Agroecology Europe (AEEU) obtained from an iterative, participatory approach with members and compared with published literature, including views from other parts of the world. The seven controversial topics as follows: i) use of agrochemicals; ii) small-scale and peasant farming versus larger farms; iii) technological innovations in agriculture and precision farming; iv) biotechnology and genetic engineering in agriculture; v) local and short food circuits; vi) social justice; vii) gender perspective. The analysis shows that there are diverse points of view related to geographical area and sociopolitical contexts. However, there are several convergences in the ambition to redesign farming and food systems, as a lever acting on several topics, and in considering agroecology with a holistic, participatory, multiactor approach for the needed transition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7764/ijanr.v47i3.2265\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/ijanr.v47i3.2265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

从欧洲的角度比较了欧洲生态农业(AEEU)的立场,并与已发表的文献(包括世界其他地区的观点)进行了比较,提出并讨论了生态农业中七个潜在的争议话题。七个争议话题如下:1)农用化学品的使用;Ii)小规模和小农农业相对于大农场;(三)农业和精准农业技术创新;农业生物技术和基因工程;V)局部和短食品回路;(六)社会正义;7)性别观点。分析表明,与地理区域和社会政治背景相关的观点多种多样。然而,在重新设计农业和粮食系统的雄心方面,作为对若干主题起作用的杠杆,以及在考虑以整体、参与性和多因素方法进行所需过渡的生态农业方面,存在一些共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversial topics in agroecology: A European perspective
Seven potential controversial topics in agroecology are presented and discussed from a European perspective comparing the position of Agroecology Europe (AEEU) obtained from an iterative, participatory approach with members and compared with published literature, including views from other parts of the world. The seven controversial topics as follows: i) use of agrochemicals; ii) small-scale and peasant farming versus larger farms; iii) technological innovations in agriculture and precision farming; iv) biotechnology and genetic engineering in agriculture; v) local and short food circuits; vi) social justice; vii) gender perspective. The analysis shows that there are diverse points of view related to geographical area and sociopolitical contexts. However, there are several convergences in the ambition to redesign farming and food systems, as a lever acting on several topics, and in considering agroecology with a holistic, participatory, multiactor approach for the needed transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信