关于别林斯基和现实主义

Q4 Arts and Humanities
A. Zhuchkova
{"title":"关于别林斯基和现实主义","authors":"A. Zhuchkova","doi":"10.31425/0042-8795-2023-4-164-179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" The article is concerned with the reception of V. Belinsky’s writings and his role in Russian literature. Formally it is written in response to A. Lyubzhin’s article ‘To bury Belinsky’ [‘Pokhoronit Belinskogo’], published on the website gorky.media on 1 February 2021. The subject is not new, and the dispute about the significance of Belinsky’s legacy for Russian literature is likely to continue. The purpose of this dialogue is neither to canonise nor dismiss (‘throw off the steamboat of modernity,’ in Mayakovsky’s words) Belinsky but rather to rethink our own ideas about literary history and in doing so to actualise its contemporary theory. It is for this reason that the status of the term ‘realism’ is examined here in depth. Following V. Tolmachyov’s lead, the author of the article proposes to revise existing views of the relationship between realism and naturalism — two principal movements defining literature in the mid to late 19th c. — in order to discard the realistic paradigm founded on artificial construct at odds with artistic principles.","PeriodicalId":52245,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Literatury","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Belinsky and realism that never was\",\"authors\":\"A. Zhuchkova\",\"doi\":\"10.31425/0042-8795-2023-4-164-179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" The article is concerned with the reception of V. Belinsky’s writings and his role in Russian literature. Formally it is written in response to A. Lyubzhin’s article ‘To bury Belinsky’ [‘Pokhoronit Belinskogo’], published on the website gorky.media on 1 February 2021. The subject is not new, and the dispute about the significance of Belinsky’s legacy for Russian literature is likely to continue. The purpose of this dialogue is neither to canonise nor dismiss (‘throw off the steamboat of modernity,’ in Mayakovsky’s words) Belinsky but rather to rethink our own ideas about literary history and in doing so to actualise its contemporary theory. It is for this reason that the status of the term ‘realism’ is examined here in depth. Following V. Tolmachyov’s lead, the author of the article proposes to revise existing views of the relationship between realism and naturalism — two principal movements defining literature in the mid to late 19th c. — in order to discard the realistic paradigm founded on artificial construct at odds with artistic principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Literatury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Literatury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-4-164-179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Literatury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-4-164-179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要探讨别林斯基作品的接受情况及其在俄罗斯文学中的作用。正式来说,这篇文章是对A. Lyubzhin在高尔基网站上发表的文章《埋葬别林斯基》(to bury Belinsky)的回应。2021年2月1日。这个话题并不新鲜,关于别林斯基遗产对俄罗斯文学意义的争论可能还会继续。这次对话的目的既不是要推崇也不是要抛弃别林斯基(用马雅可夫斯基的话来说就是“抛弃现代性的汽船”),而是要重新思考我们自己对文学史的看法,并在这样做的过程中实现其当代理论。正是由于这个原因,“现实主义”一词的地位在这里进行了深入的研究。在托尔马约夫的领导下,本文的作者建议修改现实主义和自然主义——19世纪中后期定义文学的两个主要运动——之间关系的现有观点,以抛弃建立在与艺术原则不一致的人工建构基础上的现实主义范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Belinsky and realism that never was
 The article is concerned with the reception of V. Belinsky’s writings and his role in Russian literature. Formally it is written in response to A. Lyubzhin’s article ‘To bury Belinsky’ [‘Pokhoronit Belinskogo’], published on the website gorky.media on 1 February 2021. The subject is not new, and the dispute about the significance of Belinsky’s legacy for Russian literature is likely to continue. The purpose of this dialogue is neither to canonise nor dismiss (‘throw off the steamboat of modernity,’ in Mayakovsky’s words) Belinsky but rather to rethink our own ideas about literary history and in doing so to actualise its contemporary theory. It is for this reason that the status of the term ‘realism’ is examined here in depth. Following V. Tolmachyov’s lead, the author of the article proposes to revise existing views of the relationship between realism and naturalism — two principal movements defining literature in the mid to late 19th c. — in order to discard the realistic paradigm founded on artificial construct at odds with artistic principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Literatury
Voprosy Literatury Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信