重建史前宗教有可能吗？拉脱维亚考古与信徒

IF 1.4 1区历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Archaeological Dialogues Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1017/S1380203821000209

Zenta Broka-Lāce

{"title":"重建史前宗教有可能吗？拉脱维亚考古与信徒","authors":"Zenta Broka-Lāce","doi":"10.1017/S1380203821000209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Today there is a revival of groups who claim to practice ancient Latvian religion. They often accuse archaeologists of lying and concealing the evidence of Latvian past superiority. On the one hand, this might be considered a misuse of archaeological data in order to support religious or nationalistic beliefs. On the other hand, hypothetical reconstructions of prehistoric religious beliefs are related to public archaeology and the relationship between science and the wider society. The aim of this paper is to investigate attempts to reconstruct ancient Latvian prehistoric religion through the lens of the archaeology of religion, and at the same time to broaden the discussion into the problematic relationship between nationalism and public archaeology.","PeriodicalId":45009,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Dialogues","volume":"28 1","pages":"141 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it possible to reconstruct a prehistoric religion? Latvian archaeology versus the believers\",\"authors\":\"Zenta Broka-Lāce\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1380203821000209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Today there is a revival of groups who claim to practice ancient Latvian religion. They often accuse archaeologists of lying and concealing the evidence of Latvian past superiority. On the one hand, this might be considered a misuse of archaeological data in order to support religious or nationalistic beliefs. On the other hand, hypothetical reconstructions of prehistoric religious beliefs are related to public archaeology and the relationship between science and the wider society. The aim of this paper is to investigate attempts to reconstruct ancient Latvian prehistoric religion through the lens of the archaeology of religion, and at the same time to broaden the discussion into the problematic relationship between nationalism and public archaeology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological Dialogues\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"141 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological Dialogues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203821000209\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Dialogues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203821000209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要今天，声称信奉古拉脱维亚宗教的团体复兴了。他们经常指责考古学家撒谎，隐瞒拉脱维亚过去优越的证据。一方面，这可能被认为是为了支持宗教或民族主义信仰而滥用考古数据。另一方面，对史前宗教信仰的假设性重建与公共考古以及科学与更广泛社会之间的关系有关。本文的目的是通过宗教考古的视角来考察重建拉脱维亚古代史前宗教的尝试，同时扩大对民族主义与公共考古之间问题关系的讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Is it possible to reconstruct a prehistoric religion? Latvian archaeology versus the believers

Abstract Today there is a revival of groups who claim to practice ancient Latvian religion. They often accuse archaeologists of lying and concealing the evidence of Latvian past superiority. On the one hand, this might be considered a misuse of archaeological data in order to support religious or nationalistic beliefs. On the other hand, hypothetical reconstructions of prehistoric religious beliefs are related to public archaeology and the relationship between science and the wider society. The aim of this paper is to investigate attempts to reconstruct ancient Latvian prehistoric religion through the lens of the archaeology of religion, and at the same time to broaden the discussion into the problematic relationship between nationalism and public archaeology.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Archaeological Dialogues ARCHAEOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Archaeology is undergoing rapid changes in terms of its conceptual framework and its place in contemporary society. In this challenging intellectual climate, Archaeological Dialogues has become one of the leading journals for debating innovative issues in archaeology. Firmly rooted in European archaeology, it now serves the international academic community for discussing the theories and practices of archaeology today. True to its name, debate takes a central place in Archaeological Dialogues.