耻辱的政治:格伦代尔慰安妇纪念碑和跨国纪念的复杂性

IF 0.1 0 ART
Sierra Rooney
{"title":"耻辱的政治:格伦代尔慰安妇纪念碑和跨国纪念的复杂性","authors":"Sierra Rooney","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2018.1481914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since 2010, Korean-American communities, with the support of local governments, have sponsored ten “comfort women” memorials throughout the United States. This study focuses on the memorial statue dedicated in Glendale, California as a case study for the contentious politics of “comfort women” commemorations in distinctly American contexts. Dedicated in 2013, the Glendale Comfort Women Memorial became enmeshed in a heated controversy that resulted in a federal court case. Animated by the powerful affect of shame, the debate in which this memorial was embroiled reveals the desire to lay claim to memory on a geopolitical stage, engaging issues of gender and ethnic identities and global politics. This article argues that the Glendale Comfort Women Memorial demonstrates the ways memorials in a globalised society can be employed to assign moral culpability outside of official governmental channels and disseminate histories of oppression that might previously have been forgotten. In doing so, the memorial and the public controversy that ensued also expose the limits and complications of transnational commemorations in foreign settings.","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2018.1481914","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Politics of Shame: The Glendale Comfort Women Memorial and the Complications of Transnational Commemorations\",\"authors\":\"Sierra Rooney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00043389.2018.1481914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Since 2010, Korean-American communities, with the support of local governments, have sponsored ten “comfort women” memorials throughout the United States. This study focuses on the memorial statue dedicated in Glendale, California as a case study for the contentious politics of “comfort women” commemorations in distinctly American contexts. Dedicated in 2013, the Glendale Comfort Women Memorial became enmeshed in a heated controversy that resulted in a federal court case. Animated by the powerful affect of shame, the debate in which this memorial was embroiled reveals the desire to lay claim to memory on a geopolitical stage, engaging issues of gender and ethnic identities and global politics. This article argues that the Glendale Comfort Women Memorial demonstrates the ways memorials in a globalised society can be employed to assign moral culpability outside of official governmental channels and disseminate histories of oppression that might previously have been forgotten. In doing so, the memorial and the public controversy that ensued also expose the limits and complications of transnational commemorations in foreign settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Arte\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2018.1481914\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Arte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2018.1481914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2018.1481914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自2010年以来,韩裔社区在地方政府的支持下,在美国各地赞助了10座“慰安妇”纪念碑。本研究的重点是加利福尼亚州格伦代尔市的纪念雕像,作为一个在美国独特背景下有争议的“慰安妇”纪念政治的案例研究。于2013年落成的格伦代尔慰安妇纪念碑卷入了一场激烈的争议,最终导致了一场联邦法院诉讼。在羞耻感的强烈影响下,围绕这座纪念碑展开的辩论揭示了在地缘政治舞台上主张记忆的愿望,涉及性别、种族身份和全球政治等问题。本文认为,格伦代尔慰安妇纪念碑表明,在一个全球化的社会中,纪念碑可以被用来在官方政府渠道之外分配道德罪责,并传播以前可能被遗忘的压迫历史。在这样做的过程中,纪念活动和随之而来的公众争议也暴露了跨国纪念活动在外国背景下的局限性和复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Politics of Shame: The Glendale Comfort Women Memorial and the Complications of Transnational Commemorations
Abstract Since 2010, Korean-American communities, with the support of local governments, have sponsored ten “comfort women” memorials throughout the United States. This study focuses on the memorial statue dedicated in Glendale, California as a case study for the contentious politics of “comfort women” commemorations in distinctly American contexts. Dedicated in 2013, the Glendale Comfort Women Memorial became enmeshed in a heated controversy that resulted in a federal court case. Animated by the powerful affect of shame, the debate in which this memorial was embroiled reveals the desire to lay claim to memory on a geopolitical stage, engaging issues of gender and ethnic identities and global politics. This article argues that the Glendale Comfort Women Memorial demonstrates the ways memorials in a globalised society can be employed to assign moral culpability outside of official governmental channels and disseminate histories of oppression that might previously have been forgotten. In doing so, the memorial and the public controversy that ensued also expose the limits and complications of transnational commemorations in foreign settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
De Arte
De Arte ART-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信