探索认知共情:共情咨询师反应量表的进一步验证及其在实践中的应用

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Hannah B. Bayne, Maria Stack Hankey
{"title":"探索认知共情:共情咨询师反应量表的进一步验证及其在实践中的应用","authors":"Hannah B. Bayne,&nbsp;Maria Stack Hankey","doi":"10.1002/johc.12146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we explored findings from a Rasch analysis of the Empathic Counselor Response Scale using a new sample of professional counselors. We examined differences between cognitive and affective empathy, explored whether counselors view highly empathic statements as most helpful, and offered suggestions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":45214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanistic Counseling","volume":"59 3","pages":"219-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/johc.12146","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Cognitive Empathy: Further Validation of the Empathic Counselor Response Scale and Application to Practice\",\"authors\":\"Hannah B. Bayne,&nbsp;Maria Stack Hankey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/johc.12146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, we explored findings from a Rasch analysis of the Empathic Counselor Response Scale using a new sample of professional counselors. We examined differences between cognitive and affective empathy, explored whether counselors view highly empathic statements as most helpful, and offered suggestions for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Humanistic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"219-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/johc.12146\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Humanistic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/johc.12146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanistic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/johc.12146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在本研究中,我们利用一个新的专业咨询师样本,对共情咨询师反应量表的Rasch分析结果进行了探讨。我们研究了认知共情和情感共情之间的差异,探讨了辅导员是否认为高度共情的陈述最有帮助,并为未来的研究提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Cognitive Empathy: Further Validation of the Empathic Counselor Response Scale and Application to Practice

In this study, we explored findings from a Rasch analysis of the Empathic Counselor Response Scale using a new sample of professional counselors. We examined differences between cognitive and affective empathy, explored whether counselors view highly empathic statements as most helpful, and offered suggestions for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Humanistic Counseling
Journal of Humanistic Counseling PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Humanistic Counseling (JHC) explores humanistic counseling and development and research and critical reviews emphasize innovative programs and practices to promote tolerance, nurture diversity, and uphold human rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信