人工智能与就业:系统综述

Q3 Social Sciences
Rafael DE Acypreste, Edemilson Paraná
{"title":"人工智能与就业:系统综述","authors":"Rafael DE Acypreste, Edemilson Paraná","doi":"10.1590/0101-31572022-3320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents a systematic literature review, grounded on bibliometric procedures, of the (political economy) works, produced from 2008 to 2020, on the relations between Artificial Intelligence and employment. It detects a growing tendency of published papers in this field, especially from 2019, and identifies four main groups of concerns on this topic. Within these groups, a prevalence of more optimistic over skeptical accounts and, especially, of economic orthodox over heterodox approaches on the issue can be noted. Overall, it is possible to understand that both the reviewed works and their metrics are quite dispersed and varied in scope. Among other reasons, this is due to the lack of a common basic definition, within the field, of AI in the first place.","PeriodicalId":35163,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and employment: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Rafael DE Acypreste, Edemilson Paraná\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0101-31572022-3320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper presents a systematic literature review, grounded on bibliometric procedures, of the (political economy) works, produced from 2008 to 2020, on the relations between Artificial Intelligence and employment. It detects a growing tendency of published papers in this field, especially from 2019, and identifies four main groups of concerns on this topic. Within these groups, a prevalence of more optimistic over skeptical accounts and, especially, of economic orthodox over heterodox approaches on the issue can be noted. Overall, it is possible to understand that both the reviewed works and their metrics are quite dispersed and varied in scope. Among other reasons, this is due to the lack of a common basic definition, within the field, of AI in the first place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572022-3320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572022-3320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于文献计量程序,对2008年至2020年出版的关于人工智能与就业关系的(政治经济学)著作进行了系统的文献综述。它发现了该领域发表论文的增长趋势,特别是从2019年开始,并确定了该主题的四个主要关注点。在这些群体中,可以注意到,在这个问题上,人们普遍持乐观态度,而不是持怀疑态度,特别是经济正统态度,而不是非正统态度。总的来说,可以理解评审的作品和它们的量度在范围上是相当分散和变化的。除其他原因外,这首先是由于在人工智能领域内缺乏一个共同的基本定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence and employment: a systematic review
ABSTRACT This paper presents a systematic literature review, grounded on bibliometric procedures, of the (political economy) works, produced from 2008 to 2020, on the relations between Artificial Intelligence and employment. It detects a growing tendency of published papers in this field, especially from 2019, and identifies four main groups of concerns on this topic. Within these groups, a prevalence of more optimistic over skeptical accounts and, especially, of economic orthodox over heterodox approaches on the issue can be noted. Overall, it is possible to understand that both the reviewed works and their metrics are quite dispersed and varied in scope. Among other reasons, this is due to the lack of a common basic definition, within the field, of AI in the first place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
Revista de Economia Politica/Brazilian Journal of Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy/Revista de Economia Política é uma revista acadêmica, peer reviewed, bilíngue, publicada trimestralmente desde 1981 pelo Centro de Economia Política através da Editora 34. Está indexada na Scielo e no Journal of Economic Literature. É a mais citadas das revistas acadêmicas de economia do Brasil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信