远程考试:学习和资格认证。技术和法律问题

José Antonio Tardío Pato
{"title":"远程考试:学习和资格认证。技术和法律问题","authors":"José Antonio Tardío Pato","doi":"10.51302/TCE.2021.598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work constitutes an analysis of the online exams in their double aspect, as a learning instrument, on the one hand, and a qualifying mechanism, on the other. A study of the online examinations in legal sciences is carried out both from their technical and legal perspective and thus, from a legal point of view, is examined the use of the video camera to monitor the aforementioned exams and record them, as well as of the other means of computer surveillance (e-proctoring). And the conclusion is the need for weighting up (in line with the principle of proportionality) certain rights of the student taken as a reference, on the one hand, and the possible infringement by the student of certain rules and certain rights of other students, on the other. As rights from the reference student to be weighted up, it should be highlighted the rights to self-image, privacy, inviolability of the home and data protection. And, on the other side of the scale, we must highlight, among other protected legal rights, the possible injury to the right of other students to equal opportunities and non-discrimination in the exercise of their academic rights and the violation of the right to the evaluation of academic performance with public and objective criteria, which clearly excludes the evaluation with fraud.","PeriodicalId":31970,"journal":{"name":"Tecnologia Ciencia y Educacion","volume":"1 1","pages":"155-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exámenes telemáticos: aprendizaje y calificación. Problemas técnicos y jurídicos\",\"authors\":\"José Antonio Tardío Pato\",\"doi\":\"10.51302/TCE.2021.598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work constitutes an analysis of the online exams in their double aspect, as a learning instrument, on the one hand, and a qualifying mechanism, on the other. A study of the online examinations in legal sciences is carried out both from their technical and legal perspective and thus, from a legal point of view, is examined the use of the video camera to monitor the aforementioned exams and record them, as well as of the other means of computer surveillance (e-proctoring). And the conclusion is the need for weighting up (in line with the principle of proportionality) certain rights of the student taken as a reference, on the one hand, and the possible infringement by the student of certain rules and certain rights of other students, on the other. As rights from the reference student to be weighted up, it should be highlighted the rights to self-image, privacy, inviolability of the home and data protection. And, on the other side of the scale, we must highlight, among other protected legal rights, the possible injury to the right of other students to equal opportunities and non-discrimination in the exercise of their academic rights and the violation of the right to the evaluation of academic performance with public and objective criteria, which clearly excludes the evaluation with fraud.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tecnologia Ciencia y Educacion\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"155-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tecnologia Ciencia y Educacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51302/TCE.2021.598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tecnologia Ciencia y Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51302/TCE.2021.598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作包括对在线考试的双重分析,一方面是作为学习工具,另一方面是一种资格机制。从技术和法律的角度对法学在线考试进行了研究,因此,从法律的角度,研究了使用摄像机监控和记录上述考试以及其他计算机监控手段(电子监考)的情况。结论是需要权衡(符合比例原则)作为参考的学生的某些权利,另一方面,学生可能侵犯某些规则和其他学生的某些权利。作为参照系学生的权利权重,应突出自我形象权、隐私权、家庭不可侵犯权和数据保护权。在天平的另一端,我们必须强调,在其他受保护的合法权利中,其他学生在行使学业权利时机会均等和不受歧视的权利可能受到损害,以及以公开和客观的标准评价学业成绩的权利受到侵犯,这显然排除了欺诈评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exámenes telemáticos: aprendizaje y calificación. Problemas técnicos y jurídicos
This work constitutes an analysis of the online exams in their double aspect, as a learning instrument, on the one hand, and a qualifying mechanism, on the other. A study of the online examinations in legal sciences is carried out both from their technical and legal perspective and thus, from a legal point of view, is examined the use of the video camera to monitor the aforementioned exams and record them, as well as of the other means of computer surveillance (e-proctoring). And the conclusion is the need for weighting up (in line with the principle of proportionality) certain rights of the student taken as a reference, on the one hand, and the possible infringement by the student of certain rules and certain rights of other students, on the other. As rights from the reference student to be weighted up, it should be highlighted the rights to self-image, privacy, inviolability of the home and data protection. And, on the other side of the scale, we must highlight, among other protected legal rights, the possible injury to the right of other students to equal opportunities and non-discrimination in the exercise of their academic rights and the violation of the right to the evaluation of academic performance with public and objective criteria, which clearly excludes the evaluation with fraud.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信