异常值对回归系数的影响:敏感性分析

IF 2 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Dongyi Wang
{"title":"异常值对回归系数的影响:敏感性分析","authors":"Dongyi Wang","doi":"10.1142/S1094406021500141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical research analyzes real-life data that often do not conform to a normal distribution with statistical tools such as linear regressions that require the assumption of normality. The lack of conformity to a known statistical distribution requires researchers to handle outliers properly. Accounting studies typically treat outliers with a “delete-and-forget” approach, which assumes that extreme values are erroneous and results remain insensitive to the deletion of a small number of observations. Results in this study refute these assumptions by showing that the ambiguity in handling outliers and variable selection motivates researchers to explore various analytic alternatives, which in turn produce unstable regression coefficients and heightened false-positive rates.","PeriodicalId":47122,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Outliers on Regression Coefficients: A Sensitivity Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Dongyi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S1094406021500141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical research analyzes real-life data that often do not conform to a normal distribution with statistical tools such as linear regressions that require the assumption of normality. The lack of conformity to a known statistical distribution requires researchers to handle outliers properly. Accounting studies typically treat outliers with a “delete-and-forget” approach, which assumes that extreme values are erroneous and results remain insensitive to the deletion of a small number of observations. Results in this study refute these assumptions by showing that the ambiguity in handling outliers and variable selection motivates researchers to explore various analytic alternatives, which in turn produce unstable regression coefficients and heightened false-positive rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Accounting\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406021500141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406021500141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实证研究使用需要假设正态的线性回归等统计工具来分析经常不符合正态分布的真实数据。与已知统计分布不一致需要研究人员正确处理异常值。会计研究通常采用“删除并忘记”的方法来处理异常值,该方法假设极值是错误的,并且结果对删除少量观察结果仍然不敏感。这项研究的结果反驳了这些假设,表明处理异常值和变量选择的模糊性促使研究人员探索各种分析替代方案,这反过来又会产生不稳定的回归系数和更高的假阳性率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Outliers on Regression Coefficients: A Sensitivity Analysis
Empirical research analyzes real-life data that often do not conform to a normal distribution with statistical tools such as linear regressions that require the assumption of normality. The lack of conformity to a known statistical distribution requires researchers to handle outliers properly. Accounting studies typically treat outliers with a “delete-and-forget” approach, which assumes that extreme values are erroneous and results remain insensitive to the deletion of a small number of observations. Results in this study refute these assumptions by showing that the ambiguity in handling outliers and variable selection motivates researchers to explore various analytic alternatives, which in turn produce unstable regression coefficients and heightened false-positive rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The aim of The International Journal of Accounting is to advance the academic and professional understanding of accounting theory, policies and practice from the international perspective and viewpoint. The Journal editorial recognizes that international accounting is influenced by a variety of forces, e.g., governmental, political and economic. Thus, the primary criterion for manuscript evaluation is the incremental contribution to international accounting literature and the forces that impact the field. The Journal aims at understanding the present and potential ability of accounting to aid in analyzing and interpreting international economic transactions and the economic consequences of such reporting. These transactions may be within a profit or non-profit environment. The Journal encourages a broad view of the origins and development of accounting with an emphasis on its functions in an increasingly interdependent global economy. The Journal also welcomes manuscripts that help explain current international accounting practices, with related theoretical justifications, and identify criticisms of current policies and practice. Other than occasional commissioned papers or special issues, all the manuscripts published in the Journal are selected by the editors after the normal double-blind refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信