巴西公共行政中基于能力的管理:选举公正分析

Q3 Social Sciences
Gabriel Astoni-Sena, Nina Rosa da Silveira-Cunha, M. Emmendoerfer, Luiz Rodrigo Cunha-Moura
{"title":"巴西公共行政中基于能力的管理:选举公正分析","authors":"Gabriel Astoni-Sena, Nina Rosa da Silveira-Cunha, M. Emmendoerfer, Luiz Rodrigo Cunha-Moura","doi":"10.21830/19006586.834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research analyzes competency-based management (CNM) in Brazilian electoral justice courts’ personnel management (PM). This qualitative study is based on the integrated multiple case study method using data collected from documents and interviews from six courts. It applies the thematic content analysis technique, resulting in five CBM and main PM-related practices in the courts studied. It contends that despite the norms and studies’ efforts to make CBM plausible in public organizations, its assimilation has been slow and fragmented. Thus, it evidences the need to expand research and actions in CBM evaluation programs in Public Administration that provide theoretical and practical recommendations for the strategic improvement of PM in the Judiciary System.","PeriodicalId":52330,"journal":{"name":"Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competency-based management in Brazilian public administration: an analysis of electoral justice\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Astoni-Sena, Nina Rosa da Silveira-Cunha, M. Emmendoerfer, Luiz Rodrigo Cunha-Moura\",\"doi\":\"10.21830/19006586.834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research analyzes competency-based management (CNM) in Brazilian electoral justice courts’ personnel management (PM). This qualitative study is based on the integrated multiple case study method using data collected from documents and interviews from six courts. It applies the thematic content analysis technique, resulting in five CBM and main PM-related practices in the courts studied. It contends that despite the norms and studies’ efforts to make CBM plausible in public organizations, its assimilation has been slow and fragmented. Thus, it evidences the need to expand research and actions in CBM evaluation programs in Public Administration that provide theoretical and practical recommendations for the strategic improvement of PM in the Judiciary System.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Cientifica General Jose Maria Cordova","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析胜任力管理(CNM)在巴西选举司法法院的人事管理(PM)。本定性研究基于综合多案例研究方法,使用从六个法院收集的文件和访谈数据。本文运用主题内容分析技术,得出了五个CBM和法院中与项目管理相关的主要实践。它认为,尽管规范和研究努力使信任措施在公共组织中可行,但其同化速度缓慢且支离破碎。因此,有必要扩大公共行政领域信任措施评估项目的研究和行动,为司法系统中信任措施的战略改进提供理论和实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competency-based management in Brazilian public administration: an analysis of electoral justice
This research analyzes competency-based management (CNM) in Brazilian electoral justice courts’ personnel management (PM). This qualitative study is based on the integrated multiple case study method using data collected from documents and interviews from six courts. It applies the thematic content analysis technique, resulting in five CBM and main PM-related practices in the courts studied. It contends that despite the norms and studies’ efforts to make CBM plausible in public organizations, its assimilation has been slow and fragmented. Thus, it evidences the need to expand research and actions in CBM evaluation programs in Public Administration that provide theoretical and practical recommendations for the strategic improvement of PM in the Judiciary System.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信