印度图书馆供应商的合规性和可读性隐私政策分析

C. Bareh
{"title":"印度图书馆供应商的合规性和可读性隐私政策分析","authors":"C. Bareh","doi":"10.1080/0361526X.2022.2143467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Privacy policy is crucial in educating librarians about how vendors handle patron's data and what are their current privacy practices? Fewer have studied the content of library vendors’ privacy policies for their readability score and privacy compliance. With this background, the study performed a comprehensive keyword-based, content analysis of 64 privacy policies from three category of library vendors (1) IT vendors (2) E-resource vendors (3) Publisher's cum bookseller's vendors. The study used the Flesch-Kinkaid grade level for readability score and evaluate their privacy compliance with the 11 privacy principles articulated from the India's Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (Referred to as “PDPB” in this study). The results indicate low availability of privacy policies (n = 64, 41.29%) out of 155 library vendors. Overall, the average reading grade level on all categories of vendors are similar; they are written for readers above 12 grades and are suitable for college readers. Their privacy compliance is low in all categories, with average compliance of 3∼4 out of the 11 privacy principles. Similarly, the privacy compliance in each vendor's category is the highest for data collection, processing, and sharing principles. In contrast, it is the lowest for accountability, data retention, safeguarding children's data, users’ consent and transparency. The article concludes with specific recommendations for vendors to overcome their readability and privacy compliance deficiency, thereby providing librarians with corrective measures when negotiating with vendors to protect patrons’ privacy.","PeriodicalId":39557,"journal":{"name":"Serials Librarian","volume":"83 1","pages":"148 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy Policy Analysis for Compliance and Readability of Library Vendors in India\",\"authors\":\"C. Bareh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0361526X.2022.2143467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Privacy policy is crucial in educating librarians about how vendors handle patron's data and what are their current privacy practices? Fewer have studied the content of library vendors’ privacy policies for their readability score and privacy compliance. With this background, the study performed a comprehensive keyword-based, content analysis of 64 privacy policies from three category of library vendors (1) IT vendors (2) E-resource vendors (3) Publisher's cum bookseller's vendors. The study used the Flesch-Kinkaid grade level for readability score and evaluate their privacy compliance with the 11 privacy principles articulated from the India's Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (Referred to as “PDPB” in this study). The results indicate low availability of privacy policies (n = 64, 41.29%) out of 155 library vendors. Overall, the average reading grade level on all categories of vendors are similar; they are written for readers above 12 grades and are suitable for college readers. Their privacy compliance is low in all categories, with average compliance of 3∼4 out of the 11 privacy principles. Similarly, the privacy compliance in each vendor's category is the highest for data collection, processing, and sharing principles. In contrast, it is the lowest for accountability, data retention, safeguarding children's data, users’ consent and transparency. The article concludes with specific recommendations for vendors to overcome their readability and privacy compliance deficiency, thereby providing librarians with corrective measures when negotiating with vendors to protect patrons’ privacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serials Librarian\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serials Librarian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2143467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serials Librarian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2143467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要隐私政策在教育图书馆员供应商如何处理顾客数据以及他们目前的隐私做法方面至关重要?很少有人研究图书馆供应商的隐私政策内容的可读性评分和隐私合规性。在此背景下,本研究对三类图书馆供应商(1)IT供应商(2)电子资源供应商(3)出版商兼书商供应商的64项隐私政策进行了全面的基于关键词的内容分析。该研究使用Flesch-Kinkaid等级进行可读性评分,并根据《2019年印度个人数据保护法案》(本研究中称为“PDPB”)中阐明的11项隐私原则评估其隐私合规性。结果表明,在155家图书馆供应商中,隐私政策的可用性较低(n=64,41.29%)。总体而言,所有类别供应商的平均阅读等级水平相似;它们是为12年级以上的读者而写的,适合大学读者阅读。他们的隐私合规性在所有类别中都很低,在11项隐私原则中,平均合规性为3~4项。同样,在数据收集、处理和共享原则方面,每个供应商类别的隐私合规性最高。相比之下,它在问责制、数据保留、保护儿童数据、用户同意和透明度方面是最低的。文章最后对供应商提出了具体建议,以克服其可读性和隐私合规性方面的不足,从而为图书馆员在与供应商谈判时提供纠正措施,以保护顾客的隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privacy Policy Analysis for Compliance and Readability of Library Vendors in India
ABSTRACT Privacy policy is crucial in educating librarians about how vendors handle patron's data and what are their current privacy practices? Fewer have studied the content of library vendors’ privacy policies for their readability score and privacy compliance. With this background, the study performed a comprehensive keyword-based, content analysis of 64 privacy policies from three category of library vendors (1) IT vendors (2) E-resource vendors (3) Publisher's cum bookseller's vendors. The study used the Flesch-Kinkaid grade level for readability score and evaluate their privacy compliance with the 11 privacy principles articulated from the India's Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 (Referred to as “PDPB” in this study). The results indicate low availability of privacy policies (n = 64, 41.29%) out of 155 library vendors. Overall, the average reading grade level on all categories of vendors are similar; they are written for readers above 12 grades and are suitable for college readers. Their privacy compliance is low in all categories, with average compliance of 3∼4 out of the 11 privacy principles. Similarly, the privacy compliance in each vendor's category is the highest for data collection, processing, and sharing principles. In contrast, it is the lowest for accountability, data retention, safeguarding children's data, users’ consent and transparency. The article concludes with specific recommendations for vendors to overcome their readability and privacy compliance deficiency, thereby providing librarians with corrective measures when negotiating with vendors to protect patrons’ privacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Serials Librarian
Serials Librarian Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Serials Librarian is an international journal covering all aspects of the management of serials and other continuing resources in any format—print, electronic, etc.—ranging from their publication, to their abstracting and indexing by commercial services, and their collection and processing by libraries. The journal provides a forum for discussion and innovation for all those involved in the serials information chain, but especially for librarians and other library staff, be they in a single (continuing resources) department or in collection development, acquisitions, cataloging/metadata, or information technology departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信