俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的政治文化与参与:一种具有竞争性的新公民文化?

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yerkebulan Sairambay
{"title":"俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的政治文化与参与:一种具有竞争性的新公民文化?","authors":"Yerkebulan Sairambay","doi":"10.1080/13617427.2021.1983095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article offers a critical examination of various scholarly works that attempt to study political cultures of Russia and Kazakhstan in order to explain the ways in which participatory trends are taking place. The existing literature on political cultures of these two countries is impressionistic and somehow contradictory. Reviewing recent insights into the new types of political participation both offline and online, I argue that Almond and Verba’s (1963) ‘civic culture’ lacks contestation, a fourth form of political culture. Contestation in the forms of various protests, central to less open and more autocratic societies such as Russia and Kazakhstan, have strengthened in the emerging era of Web 3.0 and globalisation. Drawing from different surveys and recent political events, the present study argues that in order to study political cultures and participation in Russia and Kazakhstan, one needs to consider contestation along with the ‘civic culture’ offered by Almond and Verba.","PeriodicalId":41490,"journal":{"name":"SLAVONICA","volume":"26 1","pages":"116 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Culture and Participation in Russia and Kazakhstan: A New Civic Culture with Contestation?\",\"authors\":\"Yerkebulan Sairambay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13617427.2021.1983095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article offers a critical examination of various scholarly works that attempt to study political cultures of Russia and Kazakhstan in order to explain the ways in which participatory trends are taking place. The existing literature on political cultures of these two countries is impressionistic and somehow contradictory. Reviewing recent insights into the new types of political participation both offline and online, I argue that Almond and Verba’s (1963) ‘civic culture’ lacks contestation, a fourth form of political culture. Contestation in the forms of various protests, central to less open and more autocratic societies such as Russia and Kazakhstan, have strengthened in the emerging era of Web 3.0 and globalisation. Drawing from different surveys and recent political events, the present study argues that in order to study political cultures and participation in Russia and Kazakhstan, one needs to consider contestation along with the ‘civic culture’ offered by Almond and Verba.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SLAVONICA\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"116 - 127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SLAVONICA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617427.2021.1983095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAVONICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13617427.2021.1983095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文对试图研究俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦政治文化的各种学术著作进行了批判性的考察,以解释参与趋势的发生方式。现有的关于这两个国家政治文化的文献是印象派的,而且在某种程度上是矛盾的。回顾最近对线下和线上新型政治参与的见解,我认为Almond和Verba(1963)的“公民文化”缺乏可竞争性,这是政治文化的第四种形式。在网络3.0和全球化的新兴时代,以各种抗议形式存在的竞争得到了加强,这些抗议活动是俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦等不太开放、更专制的社会的核心。根据不同的调查和最近的政治事件,本研究认为,为了研究俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的政治文化和参与,人们需要考虑与Almond和Verba提供的“公民文化”一起竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Culture and Participation in Russia and Kazakhstan: A New Civic Culture with Contestation?
ABSTRACT This article offers a critical examination of various scholarly works that attempt to study political cultures of Russia and Kazakhstan in order to explain the ways in which participatory trends are taking place. The existing literature on political cultures of these two countries is impressionistic and somehow contradictory. Reviewing recent insights into the new types of political participation both offline and online, I argue that Almond and Verba’s (1963) ‘civic culture’ lacks contestation, a fourth form of political culture. Contestation in the forms of various protests, central to less open and more autocratic societies such as Russia and Kazakhstan, have strengthened in the emerging era of Web 3.0 and globalisation. Drawing from different surveys and recent political events, the present study argues that in order to study political cultures and participation in Russia and Kazakhstan, one needs to consider contestation along with the ‘civic culture’ offered by Almond and Verba.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SLAVONICA
SLAVONICA HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信