“电子通讯媒体:如何规范仇恨!”

IF 1.8 Q1 LAW
L. Collingwood
{"title":"“电子通讯媒体:如何规范仇恨!”","authors":"L. Collingwood","doi":"10.1080/13600834.2022.2088065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Information technology presents the law with ongoing challenges because of its ability to capture, debate and discuss the most intimate aspects of peoples’ lives. This article will consider whether, given the ease and lack of thought processes behind many online communications, the current statutory regulations in the UK are fit for purpose. In particular, it evaluates the consequences of adapting legislation to cover situations that the legislation was never intended to address. The Malicious Communications Act 1988, for example, was originally intended to cover offences that require contemplation and a series of actions and steps in order to make them out. This aspect of calculated and targeted harm is a significant feature of the offence: for example, letters need to be written, addressed, stamped, and posted. However, given the ease and lack of thought processes behind many online communications, extending the legislation to capture this new medium represents a stark transformation of the criminal sanction originally intended and has led to confusion at law. Furthermore, extending the Communications Act 2003 has not been the panacea many expected, and this will be evaluated in tandem. Conclusions will be drawn about the aptitude of the legislation for dealing with the complexities of online communications. .","PeriodicalId":44342,"journal":{"name":"Information & Communications Technology Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Electronic communications media: how to regulate the hate!’\",\"authors\":\"L. Collingwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600834.2022.2088065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Information technology presents the law with ongoing challenges because of its ability to capture, debate and discuss the most intimate aspects of peoples’ lives. This article will consider whether, given the ease and lack of thought processes behind many online communications, the current statutory regulations in the UK are fit for purpose. In particular, it evaluates the consequences of adapting legislation to cover situations that the legislation was never intended to address. The Malicious Communications Act 1988, for example, was originally intended to cover offences that require contemplation and a series of actions and steps in order to make them out. This aspect of calculated and targeted harm is a significant feature of the offence: for example, letters need to be written, addressed, stamped, and posted. However, given the ease and lack of thought processes behind many online communications, extending the legislation to capture this new medium represents a stark transformation of the criminal sanction originally intended and has led to confusion at law. Furthermore, extending the Communications Act 2003 has not been the panacea many expected, and this will be evaluated in tandem. Conclusions will be drawn about the aptitude of the legislation for dealing with the complexities of online communications. .\",\"PeriodicalId\":44342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Communications Technology Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Communications Technology Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2088065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Communications Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2088065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信息技术给法律带来了持续的挑战,因为它能够捕捉、辩论和讨论人们生活中最亲密的方面。鉴于许多在线交流背后的轻松和缺乏思维过程,本文将考虑英国当前的法定法规是否适合目的。特别是,它评估了调整立法以涵盖立法从未打算处理的情况的后果。例如,1988年的《恶意通讯法》(Malicious Communications Act 1988)最初旨在涵盖那些需要深思熟虑并采取一系列行动和步骤才能解决的罪行。这方面的计算和有针对性的伤害是犯罪的一个重要特征:例如,信件需要书写,地址,盖章和邮寄。然而,考虑到许多在线交流背后的轻松和缺乏思考过程,将立法扩展到这种新媒体代表了最初意图的刑事制裁的明显转变,并导致了法律上的混乱。此外,延长《2003年通讯法案》并非许多人所期望的灵丹妙药,这将同时进行评估。关于立法是否适合处理网络通信的复杂性,将得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Electronic communications media: how to regulate the hate!’
ABSTRACT Information technology presents the law with ongoing challenges because of its ability to capture, debate and discuss the most intimate aspects of peoples’ lives. This article will consider whether, given the ease and lack of thought processes behind many online communications, the current statutory regulations in the UK are fit for purpose. In particular, it evaluates the consequences of adapting legislation to cover situations that the legislation was never intended to address. The Malicious Communications Act 1988, for example, was originally intended to cover offences that require contemplation and a series of actions and steps in order to make them out. This aspect of calculated and targeted harm is a significant feature of the offence: for example, letters need to be written, addressed, stamped, and posted. However, given the ease and lack of thought processes behind many online communications, extending the legislation to capture this new medium represents a stark transformation of the criminal sanction originally intended and has led to confusion at law. Furthermore, extending the Communications Act 2003 has not been the panacea many expected, and this will be evaluated in tandem. Conclusions will be drawn about the aptitude of the legislation for dealing with the complexities of online communications. .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The last decade has seen the introduction of computers and information technology at many levels of human transaction. Information technology (IT) is now used for data collation, in daily commercial transactions like transfer of funds, conclusion of contract, and complex diagnostic purposes in fields such as law, medicine and transport. The use of IT has expanded rapidly with the introduction of multimedia and the Internet. Any new technology inevitably raises a number of questions ranging from the legal to the ethical and the social. Information & Communications Technology Law covers topics such as: the implications of IT for legal processes and legal decision-making and related ethical and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信